Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Well regardless if you like "it"-Keystone or Granite- It seems to me they have spent a lot of money on these "new" trucks. I have been convinced that at some point the Swedes would say.."why are we paying for all this duplicated effort"? ..and pull the plug on Mack, but they haven't.

Or if anything limited their effort to the vocational trucks like the  Keystone/Granite and given up on the owner operator "Large Car" market.  Cat could spray paint a pile of dog crap Cat yellow and guys would gather around it and say..wow what a beautiful pile of dog crap.  Same with Paccar, they could take that pile of dog crap and put a Pete Red Oval on it and  OO's would have same reaction.

Same as Ford, had they stuck to the vocational market they might still be in the class 8 business but instead they poured a lot of money chasing the OO long haul market with minimal success.

One thing that will be interesting IMO is the big cheese from Sweden at the big Vegas introduction, said words to effect.."come and see these new Macks at Con-Ag together with our Volvo loaders..".  If the only triaxle dumps are Macks at the show with no Volvo triaxles that maybe the plan  for Mack to take care of vocational while Volvo does Long haul OO market.

In any case while they showed their new air bag tandem suspension, would have been nice if they said..."and if you want a 55,000 pound camel back with a manual you can have that too"!

As for "looks", I like them😎

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/76452-new-gen-macks/#findComment-592243
Share on other sites

Gotta say I don't hate them as much as I thought I would, still think the old Macks look better, but looks isn't in most truck owning corpos' prerequisites anymore. The only thing I absolutely despise so far is the 24v system that we argued about in a different thread. Really want Volvo to figure that out for their sake and ours honestly. Wish they could just make the old Mack's again, but these are the cards that have been dealt, and they aren't the worst hand to have I reckon. 

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/76452-new-gen-macks/#findComment-592265
Share on other sites

Seriously though....I hate the looks of the Volvo cab. Flat sided panels and square. Absolutely no styling to it at all.

And what is with these manufacturers like Mack and KW W990 most noticeably, if I had a designer come to me with those hood air intake designs I would fire them! Absolutely ugly!

The new Granite looks just l said it would....a Volvo VHD except the hood and those air intakes look like they stole it off a Freightliner 112SD.

And just like my pickup, I HATE all the buttons all over the steering wheel, digital dash and all the other electronic garbage. I took my sons new Bronco out the other day and almost had a head on because I was trying to figure out the ten millions buttons all over just to turn the wipers on.

What do I like about the new Mack's? The seats and the grill looks okay. I think the engines are just as good as anyone else today. But I also don't care for the M-Drive. I got to run one for a while in a new Granite dump truck in a gold mine this winter on hills up to 15% and I hated it. Maybe nice on highway or city streets but they don't work good on big icy hills with big weight. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/76452-new-gen-macks/#findComment-592281
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Red Horse said:

Well regardless if you like "it"-Keystone or Granite- It seems to me they have spent a lot of money on these "new" trucks. I have been convinced that at some point the Swedes would say.."why are we paying for all this duplicated effort"? ..and pull the plug on Mack, but they haven't.

Or if anything limited their effort to the vocational trucks like the  Keystone/Granite and given up on the owner operator "Large Car" market.  Cat could spray paint a pile of dog crap Cat yellow and guys would gather around it and say..wow what a beautiful pile of dog crap.  Same with Paccar, they could take that pile of dog crap and put a Pete Red Oval on it and  OO's would have same reaction.

Same as Ford, had they stuck to the vocational market they might still be in the class 8 business but instead they poured a lot of money chasing the OO long haul market with minimal success.

One thing that will be interesting IMO is the big cheese from Sweden at the big Vegas introduction, said words to effect.."come and see these new Macks at Con-Ag together with our Volvo loaders..".  If the only triaxle dumps are Macks at the show with no Volvo triaxles that maybe the plan  for Mack to take care of vocational while Volvo does Long haul OO market.

In any case while they showed their new air bag tandem suspension, would have been nice if they said..."and if you want a 55,000 pound camel back with a manual you can have that too"!

As for "looks", I like them😎

They spent far less money Bob. Now it actually has a Volvo cab......atop the all Volvo chassis. Only the hood is unique.

With the 11L engine (D11) discontinued (in the US market), and no big bore 15-16 litre engine (E9 or D16), the Mack brand's days appear numbered. 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/76452-new-gen-macks/#findComment-592287
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, mackey58 said:

What ya think about the 8 bag air ride?

I have a friend out at ConExpo this year. Theres a new Mack Keystone there so im hoping he'll check it out. Im really curious about that 8 bag suspension. From what I've seen, it looks well built and heavy duty.

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/76452-new-gen-macks/#findComment-592335
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, BottleHauler84 said:

I have a friend out at ConExpo this year. Theres a new Mack Keystone there so im hoping he'll check it out. Im really curious about that 8 bag suspension. From what I've seen, it looks well built and heavy duty.

Hendrickson

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/76452-new-gen-macks/#findComment-592342
Share on other sites

https://www.mackstefoy.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/186-_mack-maxlite-and-maxride-rear-air-suspension_eng_04_339203350.pdf

So far this it what I've read on it, but I wasn't sure or it was someone else actually making it. @kscarbel2 says its a hendrickson. 

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/76452-new-gen-macks/#findComment-592348
Share on other sites

HAS (Maxilite) is a good suspension, been around in many form and names for decades. One thing I noticed was that it can't be used with air-disk brakes which may be why the change.

Most of the damping on a tandem is transfer of load between axles, Camelback, walking beam do this very well. KW's* bag was terrible at it and rode rough. I hope Mack has done better job with their 8 Bag. 

I had HAS under hypoid and amboid axles and didn't find it had bad vibration problem. As long as you set the pinion angles correctly at running ride height, the slight variation when the suspension is doing its job didn't vibrate objectionably. 

Correction: I miss read, it says HAS can't be used with "all" disk brake packages, so I guess it can with some? 

Edited by Geoff Weeks
Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/76452-new-gen-macks/#findComment-592352
Share on other sites

On 3/3/2026 at 5:54 PM, mackey58 said:

What ya think about the 8 bag air ride?

Four more bags to change, LOL And what is the "electronic controlled" part of it they say?

I gotta say, I am a fan of Freightliner's Air Liner. I was running that since 2009 on a Freightliner, then two Western Star dump trucks working on and off road and I don't recall even ever changing an air bag. I was only replacing bags on the lift axles.

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/76452-new-gen-macks/#findComment-592398
Share on other sites

I went through the Mack web site the other day and I was really surprised to see they still offer Mack branded rear axles all the way up to 80,000 pounds and they still offer Camelback! But like I said, very disappointing no manual transmission available.

But at least they were finally smart enough to offer a real sleeper on the new Granite and Keystone. Too bad they didn't do that on the Titan, they may have sold a couple of them.

And did you notice how deep the dash is in the cab? Because half the engine is in there.  Bet they are going to be fun to work on.

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/76452-new-gen-macks/#findComment-592399
Share on other sites

Friend sent me these. The new 8 bag looks heavy duty in person and probably rides well, but it has alot of parts to it and its pretty sophisticated looking in its design. Also, it has a TON of bolts, fasteners and brackets. That might be bad for the guys in the rust belt later down the road with salt and rust hiding in around and under all those parts and pieces.....just my opinion there. 

IMG_3493.jpg

IMG_3492.jpg

IMG_3495.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/76452-new-gen-macks/#findComment-592402
Share on other sites

I just see a million wear points when compared to the Maxilite (HAS).  There is a reason Camelback and Hendrickson walking beam have such a long track life. Hendrickson was designed in the 30's IIRC.  The HAS design has been around since at least the 70's.  Both are proven and parts are easily obtained.

I am the unfortunate owner of a Neway ARDAB suspension, and if I knew then what I know now, would not have bought the truck. New isn't always better, simple is always better than complex, fewer bushings/wearable joints is better than more.

On the other hand, are these new trucks still going to be on the road 15 years on? There may be more to worry about then finding obsolete suspension parts.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/76452-new-gen-macks/#findComment-592403
Share on other sites

Yeah. Alot going on with that suspension in the pictures. To many moving parts....but i bet it rides well.I have AG460 8 bag on my KW and I like mine, but its hard on top bushing at the axle housing location .It has the big 1" air lines to the air bags and it helps the air move around and equalize and that is why it rides good. The older series KW 8 bags (AG100) I dont like, as they do ride rough due to the small air lines and bushing design. 

At the end, I agree.....the new Mack 8 bag looks like it could be a maintenance nightmare? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/76452-new-gen-macks/#findComment-592405
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...