Jump to content

Vladislav

BMT Benefactor
  • Posts

    7,842
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    76

Everything posted by Vladislav

  1. That oil pressure point makes sence to me. Actually what would you worry about lugging an engine? I think combustion process goes quite well at 1000RPM (sure not 100RPM). To me the trouble seems as insufficient oil pressure at low revs. There could be effect of high stess applied to cylinder walls or the crank group. But seems more a matter of the torque itself, not dependant to the revs. If oil pressure have meaning there must be different capacity pumps used in Maxidyne engines or a different pump drive ratio. It's easy to recognize and I belive must be a well known fact. I just never concerned it so far.
  2. Mine had a crawl through opening. The boot was held with a steel strip attached by self cutting screws put through it all over the opening. Both to the cab and sleeper walls.
  3. Funny thing you can fit a wheel of any modern American truck onto this hub and it would fit right up. Ok, it woulf fit correct if it's a stud piloted style.
  4. Lanova used common valves. At least factory description of the engine design doesn't describe anything extraordinar. There was a point on the material used for valve lifting rods which had about zero temperature expansion but I don't remember any valves especiality. Unfortunately no comments on"rees" valves too. Welcome to the site!
  5. The chassis looks nice! Glad to see you're making good progress during the years. Is the engine a kind of 2nd generation AC engine? i know they were of cylinders and a head cast as one part. And yours looks newer.
  6. Very nice! Looks like just a few steps to go and she's ready for the show season!
  7. Welcome to the forum! The truck looks very promising. Vlad
  8. It seemed to me from working on 1945 Mack chassis they primered brown all or the most of separate parts. And when the chassis was rivited together and different brackets and attachments put on they painted it all over into the final color. With cooper tubing etc already in place. So all those hidden marks you discovered seem used as the factory internal id's. Pre-assembly markings or part numbers. No matter Mack stamped the rails or a vendor they should be id'ed coming onto the assembly line. Interesting, thanks for sharing.
  9. Happy New 2022!
  10. Nice truck! Welcome to the forum and keep on progress! Vlad
  11. Good luck on the progress! L's are my favorites.
  12. Looks like a R/Superliner floor panel to me. But could be for a U/DM, I'm not almost sure at the moment. The difference is the threadle valve hole location so not difficult for visual check. These things have value since tend to rot. Someone was even looking for one on here a few moons back. I'd grab it for some bucks if have less headache with shipping.
  13. https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/66390-hatcity-rip/
  14. Cool looking dog! Welcome to BMT!
  15. Also a question is which model your truck is. If it's CH or CX (if a Mack) they have straight rails front to rear and you are able to order a full length newly made channels. Much more job removing the engine and the cab but you would get a truck with chassis of the same or even higher performance than it was originally leaving the factory. Older Macks with "fashioned" front end of the rails don't allow such approach so welding turns out as about the only option. The rails themself aren't extremely expensive. But the amount of job may differ.
  16. To me it's difficult to forget them
  17. Many were also hot riveted in the early days
  18. It's possible someone already rebuilt your chassis in the past and used rails which didn't mutch the size well enough. If the issue was done by rust the shelves of the rails must be slightly bent relating to the horizont. If so I would try to forse them down into the normal position hitting by sledgehammer along the edge or using hydraulic what's more preferrably.
  19. Sounds like impressive job done and a lot of new experience. Glad you got it fixed. Also thanks for mentioning all those underwater stones involved.
  20. Yup. As said above.
  21. You can use a 1:1 adapter for the start. If you have it handy or able to purchase cheap. Than test driving the truck you relate speedo reading with GPS or another true source. If any difference is found (I'm pretty sure it would) you divide the actual speed by the speedo figure and the result is the adapter ratio you need for correction.
  22. The diagram shows all you need to compare the weight of two frames. Sorry no help with weight of suspensions from my side. Vlad
  23. Thanks for sharing. Many interesting and nicely done jobs.
  24. `Interesting. Your suggestion makes sence. Actually those are easy to reproduce casting led or tin into gyps or even clay if you want them more. So far I haven't figured any reason I would need one though
×
×
  • Create New...