RowdyRebel Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 Regarding the FBI re-opening the investigation against Hillary and her e-mails: The election is tight, and Hillary is starting to worry about the possibility of losing the election despite the fraud and deceit Democrats love to deny exists. She knows that if Trump wins, a special prosecutor WILL be appointed and since she knows full well what she's done, she's aware of the consequences of that happening. So, just as the FBI director did her bidding to close the investigation WITHOUT recommending charges be brought (despite laying out the evidence FOR the charges), he has re-opened the case, thereby hedging her bets. We'll find out in the days AFTER the election. If she wins, there will be another "nothing to see here" press conference to announce the case is once again closed and no charges will be brought. HOWEVER, if Trump wins, that press conference will announce that sufficient evidence exists to formally charge Hillary with everything under the sun that she may have possibly done. Obama's Justice Dept will expedite those charges, and she'll plead guilty at her arraignment. This all needs to happen quickly, because Obama will pardon her before he leaves office. Once that happens, it becomes next to impossible to touch her for any of this, because you'd have to prove Obama was a co-conspirator and use that as a basis for challanging the pardon. Either way, she stays out of jail. Y'alls thoughts? 1 Quote When approaching a 4-way stop, the vehicle with the biggest tires has the right of way! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hatcity Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 interesting scenario you got there Rowdy. Quote Success is only a stones throw away.................................................................for a Palestinian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeamsterGrrrl Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 Come on, you guys can come up with better conspiracy theories! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
41chevy Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 All a ploy to make her look bad, done by Trump and the Russians, all of whom had Snowden plant the 650,000 e mails on Weiners computer. Much more believable conspiracy don't ya think? 1 Quote "OPERTUNITY IS MISSED BY MOST PEOPLE BECAUSE IT IS DRESSED IN OVERALLS AND LOOKS LIKE WORK" Thomas Edison “Life’s journey is not to arrive at the grave safely, in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting ‘Holy shit, what a ride!’” P.T.CHESHIRE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirtymilkman Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 I honestly think she believes she can do and get away with anything. She is in no fear of prison or any trouble because she really thinks she is above it all and a half hearted apology makes it all better. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TS7 Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 LOCK HER UP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david wild Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 I plan on using the Clinton defense on/in everything that comes up, works for her, should work for me. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
41chevy Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 (edited) Here's one interesting thing brought up on BBC. Can the president really pardon herself? No one knows the answer. The Constitution says that the president "shall have the power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment." This sentence, like many in the Constitution, can reasonably be interpreted in several ways. And since no court has ruled on this issue--because no president has ever tried to pardon themselves--it remains an open question. The simplest interpretation is that the president can pardon any federal criminal offense, including her own, but cannot pardon an impeachment. In other words, Clinton is free to immunize herself from criminal prosecution, but has no power over impeachment.. The last interpretation--a linguistic argument--is that "granting" can only be done unto others, not unto oneself. So Clinton can't pardon herself, though Keane is welcome to pardon Clinton if Clinton is no longer president Edited November 1, 2016 by 41chevy 1 Quote "OPERTUNITY IS MISSED BY MOST PEOPLE BECAUSE IT IS DRESSED IN OVERALLS AND LOOKS LIKE WORK" Thomas Edison “Life’s journey is not to arrive at the grave safely, in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting ‘Holy shit, what a ride!’” P.T.CHESHIRE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.