Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mack please.  Wondering if the 8 speed is the same overall length or if a different length driveshaft is needed.

The 8 speed has lower low gear ratios which would suit the job better.  I’m sure the 9 speed would work ok, but the lower gear would be better.

You'll never go wrong by doing right.

Who do you call when the lawmakers ignore the law?

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/76520-9-to-8-speed/#findComment-593705
Share on other sites

I am wanting that too.  I built a custom Fuller with a .6 of but I only use it when empty.  The Mack I’m looking at will be geared lower than my Ford.

You'll never go wrong by doing right.

Who do you call when the lawmakers ignore the law?

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/76520-9-to-8-speed/#findComment-593709
Share on other sites

Wider ratio gap between gears, means  the engine speed may be too low for the load in the next higher gear but too high in the present gear. 

Torque rise of the engine has to be matched to the gears available.  An engine set up for a 9 speed with closer steps will not be matched to a transmission with wider steps.

Edited by Geoff Weeks
Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/76520-9-to-8-speed/#findComment-593736
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Joey Mack said:

I thought I would post these to help you know the ratios. 

I think what he needs help with is the torque rise of the engine in question, and why some need close ratio steps and others in the Mack family can work with wide ratio steps. The engine torque rise has to work with the steps between gears.

You know Mack engines better than I and can advise.

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/76520-9-to-8-speed/#findComment-593752
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, terry said:

The only drawback is the engine infront of the nine speed is not made to be lugged down like it will be with the mack eight speed transmission,   terry:MackLogo:

 

11 hours ago, Flying Pig said:

I guess I’m at a bit of a loss.  A 300 can use a 5,6,7 or 8 speed but a 350 can’t?  The 350 would have more torque.  Please help me understand.

The issue @terry and I are trying and failing to get across, is that an engine built to run in front of a close ratio 9 sped is fundamentally a different engine than one built to run in front of a wide ratio transmission. The 350 and 9 spd has higher torque and hp but in a narrower band than a 300 designed to work with a wide ratio box. Maxidyne vs Econodyne. 

I hope showing the Charts for the two types would get the point across.  While placing a broad torque band engine in front of a close ratio trans will do no harm but not use the engine to its best, going the other way (placing a narrow torque band engine in front of a wide ratio box) can do some serious damage as the engine will lug at every gear change and may never have enough torque to make it into the power band of the gear it is in.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/76520-9-to-8-speed/#findComment-593754
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, terry said:

As geoff said, i had a 285 which is a engine you can lug down to about 1100 or 1200 RPM's i had it with a mack 12 speed and loved that combination.  terry:MackLogo:

My 237 worked well with Triplex.  It could pull down, but seemed better with tighter splits available.  Granted I am not pulling 80k lbs.

My 300+ had a 5 spd behind it.  I know the transmission was original to the truck but not sure the engine was.  I bet it was a dog with only 5 gears.

IMG-20180116-202556-655.jpg

Larry

1959 B61 Liv'n Large......................

Charter member of the "MACK PACK"

 

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/76520-9-to-8-speed/#findComment-593758
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Freightrain said:

My 237 worked well with Triplex.  It could pull down, but seemed better with tighter splits available.  Granted I am not pulling 80k lbs.

My 300+ had a 5 spd behind it.  I know the transmission was original to the truck but not sure the engine was.  I bet it was a dog with only 5 gears.

Yeah before my285 and 12 speed, my truck had a237 and a quad, liked that too, but that quad was a no no on lugging way down. hard on that single countershaft trans.  terry:MackLogo:

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/76520-9-to-8-speed/#findComment-593759
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...