Best of Trump

[mowerman]

Well with all this  modern day equipment?.. I understand they are ready and watching everything and Joey I wish  you a speedy recovery 

[mechohaulic]

22 minutes ago, Joey Mack said:

Yep. Im home sick, so I have Fox News on T.V. I just saw him say that... 

now if you had a Mack model to  build; the "brain wash " TV wouldn't be an option from boredom.

[kscarbel2]

Actions speaking louder than words, the US just captured its sixth "shadow fleet" tanker. It's good real-world practice for our elite.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15467311/Dramatic-moment-US-forces-storm-oil-tanker-Trump-plays-kingmaker-Venezuela.html

[kscarbel2]

 

[kscarbel2]

Allegedly, Netanyahu asked President Trump to not launch military strikes against Iran over fears Iran would retaliate against Israel. I humbly suggest the US can't make a decision based on that. We give Israel billions in aid money annually and they are well equipped to defend themselves (iron dome, ect.). The US needs to take care of business and Netanyahu must respect and support that. After all we've done for them....despite the USS Liberty..................

And after all, with the termination of the current regime, a free and democratic Iran would be in Israel's best interest.

[70mackMB]

[70mackMB]

[70mackMB]

[70mackMB]

[70mackMB]

[70mackMB]

[kscarbel2]

No country is watching the protests in Iran with greater interest than Israel, which sees the Islamic Republic as a mortal enemy and an existential threat.

Iran has been the obsession of Netanyahu, who has portrayed the government in Tehran and its supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, as a global menace on the order of Nazi Germany.

Israelis would cheer if the Iranian regime were to fall.

Yet former officials and analysts say that the Israeli leadership is unlikely to do much to try to precipitate a regime change, seeing the Iranian government as far from the brink of collapse and the current protests as insufficient to push it to that point. Israel is unlikely to attack Iran unless it is invited into a U.S.-led operation, or unless Iran attacks Israel first.

And its caution about a U.S. attack on Iran is well justified. The risks of blowback against Israel — including a new war — are too great. And the chances that anything short of a major offensive could topple Iran’s authoritarian clerical rulers are too remote.

Israeli analysts predict that the current wave of demonstrations in Iran will be short-lived. The protesters lack leadership and the means to defend themselves, given reports this week that Iranian security forces had killed thousands of demonstrators.

“If there were millions of people on the street, it would be very difficult to stop them. You cannot kill everyone,” says Mossad. “But we don’t see millions. We see thousands. And this regime knows how to handle that. Their first tool is to kill people, and to make sure that everybody knows that they’re killing.”

[tjc transport]

my personal opinion is the USA should leave iran to it own dealings. 

if the people there REALLY want change, let them do it themselves. 

[kscarbel2]

CIA director John Ratcliffe met Venezuela's Interim President Delcy Rodríguez in Caracas on Thursday "at President Trump's direction."

The two-hour meeting was aimed at building trust and communication.

Ratcliffe and Rodríguez discussed potential economic collaboration and that "Venezuela can no longer be a safe haven for America's adversaries."

[kscarbel2]

15 minutes ago, tjc transport said:

my personal opinion is the USA should leave iran to it own dealings. 

if the people there REALLY want change, let them do it themselves. 

I agree. What's sad is if one went back to Iran in the 1970s, they'd feel as though they were in a western country. It was very cosmopolitan and business was booming. And 98% of the heavy trucks sold in Iran were Macks.

[mechohaulic]

54 minutes ago, tjc transport said:

my personal opinion is the USA should leave iran to it own dealings. 

if the people there REALLY want change, let them do it themselves. 

sad part is no one questions the statement "a deal has been reached " ; the deal is billions of dollars pocketed by those making deals. typical  Monty Hall "let's make a deal " otherwise known as What's in it for Me!!

[67RModel]

What about Greenland? Does anybody feel good about going down this road? 

[Joey Mack]

I dont like how it is being portrayed.. The news makes it look like President Trump is just going to take over the country.  I prefer a business deal.

[kscarbel2]

56 minutes ago, 67RModel said:

What about Greenland? Does anybody feel good about going down this road? 

I completely understand the thinking that, if the west's most powerful country controlled that massive land mass called Greenland, then the two major opponents could be kept at bay. How is came to be under Denmark is a bit of a sticky wicket (a tricky/awkward situation).

[kscarbel2]

I wouldn't say he's concerned about the policy. He wants deportations. He wants mass deportations. What he doesn't want is what people are seeing. He doesn't like the way it looks. It looks bad, so he's expressed some discomfort at that… There's the right way to do this. And this doesn't look like the right way to a lot of people.

Top Trump adviser