67RModel

Could somebody post a picture of what the whole system plumbing is supposed to look like? A photo from an original tip turbine equipped truck?

SOLD about a year ago now

If I'm not mistaken there was like a year or two in the early 80s, maybe 1980/81 when Mack painted the engines red. And I don't think it was exclusive to fire trucks. I have seen several over the years that have a dull red engine paint.

No affiliation. Saw on FB Marketplace but thought it was a pretty interesting truck so I figured I would post it here and see what everyone thinks. Obviously its a ton of money. I'm not sure who the market would be for a truck like this. Collectors or Guys looking for a reliable old school workhorse. I would think a super heavy spec day cab that is 5-10 years old would be around the same money. Question I have is do you think there are guys that are willing to spend $75k on something like this and use it daily? 1984 RD686 Mack tractor with 25k org miles.300 6 sp 58,000 rears 11x22 tires wet system fenders 18 F - Commercial Vehicles - Boston, Massachusetts | Facebook Marketplace | Facebook

What about a viscous fan hub? I know its a strictly mechanical device and the ECM on a newer engine might not be happy if there was no input or output from/to a fan. I don't know. My 94 RD has a viscous fan clutch and I never seem to know what that c**ksucker is doing. It spins on startup then seems to decouple but the drag keeps it spinning but probably not at engine speed. Its all very confusing. but no matter what amount of load you put on the engine the water temperature never gets above 175F. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

This thread made me think of a B model that has been siting outside in the same sport on the outskirts of Pittsburgh for literal decades. I honestly remember seeing this truck sit in the exact same spot back when I was a toddler riding in a car seat in the late 1980s. It hasn't moved since and actually doesn't look bad at all. Right on PA51 in McKees Rocks, PA. I was through there about a month ago and its still there....

Operate only at night?

Yea the largest contractor the USPS has is Fed Ex. Has been that way for a long time. That contract is worth like $1.5 billion annually. Top U.S. Postal Service Suppliers in 2023:‎ Transportation Suppliers Again Carry the Mail ‎ – TLA

Is the USPS even relevant anymore? Last I heard they were insolvent and had to be propped up with borrowed taxpayer money to operate every year. Get rid of it and auction everything it owns of to the highest bidder. Why do I care if the USPS, UPS, DHL, or Fed Ex brings my junk to my doorstep. At least the latter three don't operate on borrowed taxpayer money. If there is a continued need or desire by the market for daily letter mail delivery a business from the private sector will be able do it better and cheaper than the USPS boondoggle can.

I'm all for gutting large portions of the federal government and eliminating all the waste fraud and abuse. Heck, I would probably support eliminating non fraudulent and abusive sections of federal government. Its an absolute disgrace what it has become in terms or usefulness and wastefulness. at $36 trillion in debt it is obviously completely insolvent and Congress and Presidents refuse to take any meaningful action on it. THE only reason this asinine amount of debt hasn't become a crisis yet is because the US Dollar is the world's reserve currency, which is starting to come under threat but that is a topic for a different discussion. I'm very confident the United States' national debt could be reduced to 50% of GDP by year 2050 and the average citizen would not know the difference. However, since Congress refuses to take action, and on the contrary, actually doubles down on even larger budget deficits year after year you get what you have now. Trump in there with a chainsaw. Fine. Who cares. If that's what its going to take then so be it. Both parties and Congress going back at least 50 years only have themselves to blame for letting it get to this point. I would say Trump is doing the correct thing by employing auditors to go in a slash all this trash this corrupt government has been building for decades. With that said I think Trump is very dangerously playing with fire with regards to implementing tariffs of this quantity and magnitude as well as his handling of international relations with extremely close allies and neighbors. I'm not an economist. This is only my opinion based on some limited economics education and studying of history and trade policies since WWII. When implemented like this, tariffs pretty much always have an overall negative consequence, especially for the tariffing country. A tariff is a tax, and with any business tax, it is paid by the consumer. Businesses never pay tax, they only collect them. The only way prices don't increase is if the business takes a loss on their profit which is possible if there is a US competitor. But realistically speaking how may US based competitors are there for essentially every single thing coming into this country? The USA has not been a manufacturing country for decades. To think that is going to suddenly reverse course in a few years is simply daft. Moreover, I just don't see any overall alignment on this among political parties, politicians, or even economists for that matter to last any longer than this administration. And the election cycle and balance of power in this country is too fickle. in 3.5 years there will be a different president elected and if these tariffs are still in place they will most likely be all walked back. My guess is most offshore manufacturers will ride it out and sell at a smaller profit (if there is an a non-tariffed competitor here in country) and wait and see for 3.5 years. All the while the average citizen and retail investor will be getting hammered. This is akin to a brain surgeon using a chainsaw to remove a patient's brain tumor. I don't think this is the proper way to undo decades worth of offshoring. I would welcome anyone to find a reputable left or right leaning economist who thinks this is a good plan. I'll remain somewhat open minded and hope this is a strategy to "strongarm" other nations into negotiating a more favorable, long term trade deal with the USA but I don't have high hopes. At best everything is going to get more expensive, and we will slog on until the tariffs are eventually lifted, and we are back to where we started. At worst this will set off an all-out global trade war with the USA. I personally want neither.

I guess the bulldog hood ornament creates too much drag and had to be eliminated to save a thimble full of fuel over the trucks lifetime.

Nice thing about Reno though is stuff could last for decades out there and not rot away.

Realistically speaking, if correct, Schumer at age 74 and a net worth of $2.3 million is not out of line at all. Warren, age 75 worth $9 million is more questionable but probably not out of line depending on real estate holdings. She has done several if not many book deals as well. I don't know about McConnell and Pelosi. They both have ridiculous money, but I think in both cases most of it comes from their spouses' net worth. My guess is every federal politician is at some level corrupt and obtains wealth through questionable, but legal means. They are essentially insider traders. There are websites that track every trade Nacy Pelosi makes. She (all politicians) have to disclose all their trades. Trouble is, its months after the fact.

Heck, Carter signed the airline deregulation act in 1978. Info on this bill is more readily available. It passed the House 363-8 and the Senate 83-9. Could you imagine these clowns today being that bipartisan? 😂

Negative. The bill, named Motor Carrier Act of 1980 was signed into law on 7/1/1980 by Jimmy Carter. Regan didn't become president until 1/20/1981. The contents of the bill were developed by I.C. commissioners appointed by both Nixon, Ford, and Carter. But the main sponsor of the bill was Ted Kennedy. One would have to look up the yeas and nays of how Congress voted on the bill but my guess is it was a very bipartisan vote. I have no doubt Reagan would have signed it into law if it landed on his desk. You need to call balls when balls come and strikes when strikes come.