Jump to content

h67st

Pedigreed Bulldog
  • Posts

    2,185
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    29

Posts posted by h67st

  1. 11 hours ago, mechohaulic said:

    back in the day; 5th wheels were mounted with only long u-bolts ; way too much movement. most all wheels mounted later were bolted to their own  plates which were bolted to angle iron bolted through the frame rails not the frame flange . as stated earlier, with out the main frame plate  on the 5th wheel too much flex would be on the chassis. of the 50-60 + 5th wheels i mounted while at Mack none were direct mount to the frame. all were either welded to angle iron   bolted to the frame (sliders) or bolted to the iron that was bolted to frame (fixed).

    I've seen a bunch of trucks with u-bolt mounting that had blocks of steel welded to the frame rail flange to keep the thing from moving back and forth. Of course, they shouldn't be welding on that flange.

    • Like 1
  2. On 8/25/2022 at 9:26 PM, mattb73lt said:

    24 years ago this weekend I found this truck in Litchfield, CT. Dragged it home and dropped it in front of my barn at the house I bought about a year and a half beforehand. Lots of things have transpired since that time, but one of the good things is seeing this truck, nearing completion, sitting in the same exact spot.

    It's funny...the cab doesn't look that bad in the "before" photo but I know you had to cut out a lot of rust and damage to rebuild it. Same way with my truck, bondo covered many sins.

  3. 8 hours ago, mrsmackpaul said:

    In Australia the angles have sit proud of the flange so there is 1/8 gap between the plate and the chassis rail flange

    Would be a shame if the same rules applied over there and you had to bugger up the paint work

    Great stuff and a very detailed video

    Paul 

    So they don't want the fifth wheel sitting directly on the frame rail? I wonder why that is.

  4. 15 hours ago, 85snowdog said:

    I see the poster that asked this question never came back . But I wanted to help shed a little more light on it for you . 

    The first number 6 you got right . The 59 is the engine code . From my list from BMT , its a Cummins NHRS6B/320 . I honestly don't know what that is ,lol . Hopefully you can help in that department . 

    You got everything else right , as far as I know . The ST at the end of the number means a little more than twin screw . The "S" means twin screw . The "T" means it was built to be a tractor . 

    A guy named "Cam" on the ATHS forum says that the NHRS6B is a supercharged 743 cid engine, but supposedly they quit putting them in trucks in the '60s so maybe not the right engine code for this truck. If it's a '79 it should have an 855 Cummins.

    • Like 1
  5. I started looking things over to see if it will run and found the intake pipe missing a clamp, allowed rain water to go into the turbo. Fortunately the shaft still spins free, but I want to pull the housing off to see what is lurking inside. A great example of something simple like a clamp causing bigger problems. The engine tag says it's a 335.

    160.JPG

    • Like 2
  6. Wikipedia says, "In 1940 the US Army ordered 700 Mack 4 x 4 truck tractors, intended to tow pontoon-carrying semi-trailers. 694 were delivered in 1941 and the last 6 in 1942. An Autocar design was standardized by the US Army and only 700 NJUs were built." Since this is a '41, it could be ex-WWII Army truck.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...