Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, davehummell said:

Many years ago I worked at a trucking company that ran the 285's with the 5 speed in several cabovers to the coast and they sent a R model with a 237 with 5 speed on a weekly run to Canada. I knew a guy that I used to do work for that had a R model running to Texas and back

The difference is, the 237 and 285 were made for only 5 gears.  The 300+ isn't, so I bet it was slow to recover on a shift.

IMG-20180116-202556-655.jpg

Larry

1959 B61 Liv'n Large......................

Charter member of the "MACK PACK"

 

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75768-300-rebuild/page/3/#findComment-578917
Share on other sites

Im very interested in this build.please keep us up to date with it.A bit of a side question but how rare is a tip turbine nowadays?I have never seen one but Im interested in how they run.. ....

Paul

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75768-300-rebuild/page/3/#findComment-578924
Share on other sites

I was going to try to add one to my 237, but got a whole motor.  I hear they are quiet noisy at full song?  Guess I will find out.

 

Seeing they are 40+ yrs old, it is likely harder to find one?  Mine does work, as I had motor running and if I jabbed the throttle it would send a touch of wind into it and it would spin easily.

They were popular before CAC was mounted in front of radiator.

IMG-20180116-202556-655.jpg

Larry

1959 B61 Liv'n Large......................

Charter member of the "MACK PACK"

 

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75768-300-rebuild/page/3/#findComment-578925
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Freightrain said:

I was going to try to add one to my 237, but got a whole motor.  I hear they are quiet noisy at full song?  Guess I will find out.

 

Seeing they are 40+ yrs old, it is likely harder to find one?  Mine does work, as I had motor running and if I jabbed the throttle it would send a touch of wind into it and it would spin easily.

They were popular before CAC was mounted in front of radiator.

The tip turbine and Low Flow cooling were both attempts to better charge cooling without have to re design the front of the truck for enough room for an CAC cooling radiator (Air to air).

once trucks were being redesigned anyway, the reasons for the tip turbine and low flow systems went away. Having the charge cooler in front of the radiator give the best cooling, and what has become the std today. 

At the time, Mack tip turbine was revolutionary, both Cat and Cummins were still using water cooled aftercoolers, and low thermostat temps, to walk the fine line between good block temp and enough cooling for the charge air. 

 After Macks success, Cummins used the low flow system to run the "super cooled" multi-pass radiator coolant through the aftercooler, before sending it the engine. Cat never did and opted for the cooler in front of the radiator, which meant that their engines above 400 hp could not be fitted to many trucks. Cat engines below 400 hp still had the old water cooled aftercooler.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75768-300-rebuild/page/3/#findComment-578930
Share on other sites

I got it up on legs and the pan dropped.  Looks like someone has been in it before.  Orange silicone on the back and the main bolts look like the paint is chipped off like it has been apart.  Rolled new brgs?  It has signs that things have been apart other places(orange silicone).  

When I looked at truck originally I tried to find the serial number on frame but severe mud and crap kept me from getting in too close.  I wonder if this is a transplant?  Truck had straight 5 spd, did it originally have a 285 and this was put in?  Never know now.

Has new air compressor and lots of other pieces that don't match paint.  It was definitely tinkered with.  No idea on mileage (or hours) either.

One bigass pan.

IMG_20250714_095955605.jpg

Noticable marks from previous fingers in the bottom end.

IMG_20250714_100022763_HDR.jpg

Will work on getting heads off next.

IMG-20180116-202556-655.jpg

Larry

1959 B61 Liv'n Large......................

Charter member of the "MACK PACK"

 

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75768-300-rebuild/page/3/#findComment-579018
Share on other sites

On 7/12/2025 at 1:34 PM, Geoff Weeks said:

The tip turbine and Low Flow cooling were both attempts to better charge cooling without have to re design the front of the truck for enough room for an CAC cooling radiator (Air to air).

once trucks were being redesigned anyway, the reasons for the tip turbine and low flow systems went away. Having the charge cooler in front of the radiator give the best cooling, and what has become the std today. 

At the time, Mack tip turbine was revolutionary, both Cat and Cummins were still using water cooled aftercoolers, and low thermostat temps, to walk the fine line between good block temp and enough cooling for the charge air. 

 After Macks success, Cummins used the low flow system to run the "super cooled" multi-pass radiator coolant through the aftercooler, before sending it the engine. Cat never did and opted for the cooler in front of the radiator, which meant that their engines above 400 hp could not be fitted to many trucks. Cat engines below 400 hp still had the old water cooled aftercooler.

I wondered what "low flow cooling" was.  Terms passed around and never knew what it was about.  Thanks for clarifying.

IMG-20180116-202556-655.jpg

Larry

1959 B61 Liv'n Large......................

Charter member of the "MACK PACK"

 

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75768-300-rebuild/page/3/#findComment-579019
Share on other sites

Ha ha hey Larry, I was just thinking the same thing I never really knew what the turbine tip did. I never owned one but I think my 82  cruise liner had the air to air. I don’t remember I sold it a long time ago, but It  had a 350 Thermodyne, which was a really healthy engine, especially after getting out of a 237. And yes.Geoff thanks for the explanation.

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75768-300-rebuild/page/3/#findComment-579020
Share on other sites

Got the heads off.  Yup, took a 5ft cheater to get them to SNAP loose.

Looks like I had a head gasket on its way out on #4?

IMG_20250714_151031677.jpg

IMG_20250714_151046415.jpg

Rest looks ok.  Cylinders ok, no damage.

IMG_20250714_151051332.jpg

Noticable wear on top of liner.  Not huge ridge, but very detectable.  Not a " fresh" rebuild.

  • Like 1

IMG-20180116-202556-655.jpg

Larry

1959 B61 Liv'n Large......................

Charter member of the "MACK PACK"

 

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75768-300-rebuild/page/3/#findComment-579060
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Freightrain said:

Got the heads off.  Yup, took a 5ft cheater to get them to SNAP loose.

Looks like I had a head gasket on its way out on #4?

IMG_20250714_151031677.jpg

IMG_20250714_151046415.jpg

Rest looks ok.  Cylinders ok, no damage.

IMG_20250714_151051332.jpg

Noticable wear on top of liner.  Not huge ridge, but very detectable.  Not a " fresh" rebuild.

Check the fire ring grooves on the heads  ! This will be important on re assembly!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75768-300-rebuild/page/3/#findComment-579061
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, fjh said:

Check the fire ring grooves on the heads  ! This will be important on re assembly!

They are there, #4 had some crud in the area where gasket was blown.  It was going to get worse had I try to just install and run it.

IMG-20180116-202556-655.jpg

Larry

1959 B61 Liv'n Large......................

Charter member of the "MACK PACK"

 

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75768-300-rebuild/page/3/#findComment-579064
Share on other sites

Was hesitant to pull injectors, but going to have heads cleaned up.  Should I zip the two bolts out of clamp and do they pop out easily?  Will there be a seal ring in hole?

IMG-20180116-202556-655.jpg

Larry

1959 B61 Liv'n Large......................

Charter member of the "MACK PACK"

 

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75768-300-rebuild/page/3/#findComment-579067
Share on other sites

Shop I use can cut rings.  No issue there.  Using fingernail, I'm guessing +.020 deep currently.  Pretty solid groove.

I did get #6 piston out.  Was able to wiggle past oiler. 

Rod bearing was 12-7 112

62GB33-P1

Crank and bearings look fine.

IMG-20250714-165801385-HDR.jpg

 

  • Like 1

IMG-20180116-202556-655.jpg

Larry

1959 B61 Liv'n Large......................

Charter member of the "MACK PACK"

 

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75768-300-rebuild/page/3/#findComment-579073
Share on other sites

Not sure of year.  Only thing I have is serial on motor.

EtAZ673C 7S8762. If that means anything.

I looked on Agkits and they want truck serial number.  I hope we can work around that.

IMG-20180116-202556-655.jpg

Larry

1959 B61 Liv'n Large......................

Charter member of the "MACK PACK"

 

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75768-300-rebuild/page/3/#findComment-579086
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mark T said:

That head gasket looks more like it was rotted. Doesn't seem to be passing combustion there. If you decide to resurface the heads, be sure you're friends with someone who can recut the fire rings, and you may want check that person has a tool that'll hit the same circle. Old heads mightalready be done once or twice and not enough left to mill off and start over again. So if the cut on them now is a little out of round, it will have been ok as long as it was into the ring, new cut a little off of the existing circle....no good (F's right they're important) Why's that main cap painted ?  Pay attention what's going on there. Like make sure it's not cut already and requires a different bearing. ( they did stuff like that back then, like cut one journal a couple thousanths and nothing else is cut ) If I remember, it was a "P" number that went along with bearing size.  Engine looks like a good candidate for a rebuild.

Yup p number is important they can start as low as p2 up to p30 check em as up pull them look at the numbers! For sure good call Mark! Rods as well ! Eyes pealed for this  part number then p2/10/20 and so on!

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75768-300-rebuild/page/3/#findComment-579094
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Freightrain said:

Ford had similar coding for clearances so they could put correct parts together without having assembler measure anything.

Mack would sometimes do one journal I was taught to always look! Mains and rods ! On a v8 they sometimes they would mark the caps main or rod M 2.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75768-300-rebuild/page/3/#findComment-579100
Share on other sites

I was taught the same thing.  Mack would only cut the journal that needed cutting. To this day i look at all the counter weights, and bearing numbers.. i dont assume. And Mack bearing kits are not always packed in the correct order.  I was blessed to have a cranky old Man take me under his wing... Earl Harnden was his name.   Maine Mack, 299 Warren ave. ,Portland M.E.   

I had to post his name.. He went home a couple years ago..  

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75768-300-rebuild/page/3/#findComment-579102
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...