Jump to content

New Mack's H.P rating ...flywheel or rear wheel?


Recommended Posts

I thought :mack1: used to rate hp as bhp that meant "Brake Horse Power",while others used the flywheel hp rating . I used to hear it from the naysayers a lot! :idunno:

IF YOU BOUGHT IT, A TRUCK BROUGHT IT..AND WHEN YOU'RE DONE WITH IT, A TRUCK WILL HAUL IT AWAY!!! Big John Trimble,WRVA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright then,I stand corrected. :blush: I argued with a couple guys (veteran drivers) years ago that told me Cummins rated their horsepower at the flywheel,while :mack1: rated theirs at the wheel and that was why a 237 could kick a 290 Cummins' ass. I told them no, it was the amount of torque at low RPM that was responsible for that (and superior engineering)! Not to mention the :bulldog1: was a better truck! This was some 35 years ago,when I wore a younger man's clothes! I really didn't care,I knew what I was going to buy when the time came around.

IF YOU BOUGHT IT, A TRUCK BROUGHT IT..AND WHEN YOU'RE DONE WITH IT, A TRUCK WILL HAUL IT AWAY!!! Big John Trimble,WRVA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those cheap jap radios will tell you anything when your out on the road.Look at it this way, no engine manufactory would let the end user which is the truck builder rate their engine.The reason a 237 mack can out work a 290 and 335 cummins is because they have a low end torque rise that cummins did not have back then.With a 5 speed and max torque and HP at 1200 they was more than a 290 cummins.Cummins did try to duplicate the maxidyne with the NHCT 270 with a 5 speed but it was not what a 237 was.A maxidyne was very misunderstood by drivers and may be to this day but its how you drive it.Most guys wanted to keep the rpm up as hi as they could and would not let it pull down were it was working good.

glenn akers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back in the dark ages of high school, a science teacher once said that HP is for speed and torque is for getting work done.

He drank a lot of coffee. Always wondered what was in his coffee mug?

I would go with the 237 to get work done.

Jim

It doesn't cost anything to pay attention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back in the day it was common practice to turn a engine up before the owner took delivery of there new truck and this would get you real close to the hp rateing being at rear wheel hp. A little timing and fuel was all you needed. But from the factory all are rated at flywheel .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright then,I stand corrected. :blush: I argued with a couple guys (veteran drivers) years ago that told me Cummins rated their horsepower at the flywheel,while :mack1: rated theirs at the wheel and that was why a 237 could kick a 290 Cummins' ass. I told them no, it was the amount of torque at low RPM that was responsible for that (and superior engineering)! Not to mention the :bulldog1: was a better truck! This was some 35 years ago,when I wore a younger man's clothes! I really didn't care,I knew what I was going to buy when the time came around.

I was told the same....and kinda the same example of why a 300 Mack would run with a 350 cummins....I was also told that Mack rated at the wheels because they made the whole truck and would test the H.P. loss thru the drivetrain and post the end H.P result at the rear wheel.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

is and always has been at the flywheel. way too many variables to rate at rear wheel when you think about it. take several trucks with same HP rating, but different transmissions, oil weights, axles, etc, etc and the power at the wheels would vary....different friction values equal more or less parasitic driveline losses. Heck even the same HP rating can vary from engine to engine, there is usually a range the factory will let stuff go at (+/-2% or something like that). So two 500HP engines may actually have anywhere from 490-510HP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That myth has been around since I have been working on trucks ,Like been said to many variables to take a measurement at the wheels.One thing that is not a mtth is what was said about a 237. If it was not for them we would not have the big horses we have now. They delievered the material that it took to invent the bigger engines.They made money for a lot of poor people.Ever one could not own a peterbilt.

glenn akers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...