Jump to content

Recommended Posts

You can disagree with Eaton, that is fine, I went to the source to make sure I gave the correct info.

further more it is a used box, so you have no idea what it was filled with.

Eaton doesn't mention a need to "flush" if a different or unknown lubricant is being replaced by something else.

 Synthetic has better heat qualities than SAE 50 which has better than GL-1. Each is a step up.

 In this application, which is so far down the scale from the transmissions rating, SAE 50 would be fine. Even GL according to Eaton would be ok, but I would not recommend it. They list it as acceptable in other parts of the world (in the same transmissions)! 

Edited by Geoff Weeks
  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75768-300-rebuild/page/35/#findComment-593475
Share on other sites

I thought I saw specs that say it was okay to use. I also understand that changing now would likely not be a good idea.  But, the fact that this transmission was never shifted would alter that fact slightly.  The discs are still permeated with synthetic oil.  So I guess I will change my bucket out.

IMG-20180116-202556-655.jpg

Larry

1959 B61 Liv'n Large......................

Charter member of the "MACK PACK"

 

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75768-300-rebuild/page/35/#findComment-593476
Share on other sites

I wouldn't give SAE 50 a minute of thought before filling the trans with it. Your call. SAE 50 is listed as approved. 

Any used transmission syncro is going to "be saturated" with what ever was run before, It will not make a difference, but as I say, your money, your call.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75768-300-rebuild/page/35/#findComment-593477
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Geoff Weeks said:

You can disagree with Eaton, that is fine, I went to the source to make sure I gave the correct info.

further more it is a used box, so you have no idea what it was filled with.

Eaton doesn't mention a need to "flush" if a different or unknown lubricant is being replaced by something else.

 Synthetic has better heat qualities than SAE 50 which has better than GL-1. Each is a step up.

 In this application, which is so far down the scale from the transmissions rating, SAE 50 would be fine. Even GL according to Eaton would be ok, but I would not recommend it. They list it as acceptable in other parts of the world (in the same transmissions)! 

I know you like to argue with people,  and its ok because most dont take it personally...including me. I respect your knowledge. 

Will you point me to the section of your information that deals with drains and refills? I was referring to what Eaton currently recommends (PS-386), and the idea that you dont mix mineral based oils with synthetics. It never has and still isn't a good idea. Will it work, yeah im sure it will. Along with 80w90 gear oil, 50w engine oil,  iso32 hydraulic oil, vegetable oil, maybe just put a grease zerk on it and fill it with grease. 

Why not just put back in it what eaton calls for?

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75768-300-rebuild/page/35/#findComment-593480
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, BottleHauler84 said:

Why not just put back in it what eaton calls for?

Eaton calls for many choices, it is right there in their manual. I am not recommending something that Eaton does not. Larry wasn't happy about paying the expense for synthetic and according to Eaton it isn't required.

 I found no info saying flushing was required at any point in the manuals I read when changing lube, if it isn't there (it may be and I missed it?) I can't point to it. If you can point to where it is required, I will accept that.  

When you made the the statement that syn was required it was something I had not heard or read, so I went to the source to see if my understanding was incorrect, it was not. So I linked the source material for all to read. 

IF you want extended drain intervals and you want Eaton to warranty it, then and only then does Eaton require its use for warranty purposes.  

On a used transmission none of those apply. All the oil I listed are approved by Eaton for their HD manual transmissions. 

By your reasoning deleting the oil cooler would also void any factory warranty. But they are not required below 350hp, although you pointed him to the delete plate. By the title of this thread, he is well below that.

Transmission lube has an easy job compared to other boxes, no combustion gases, no hypoid or amboid gearing, little chance of moisture accumulating, just spur gearing, roller bearings and one double ended syncro. 

Edited by Geoff Weeks
Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75768-300-rebuild/page/35/#findComment-593482
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...