Jump to content

Ditchdiggerjcf

Pedigreed Bulldog
  • Posts

    580
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ditchdiggerjcf

  1. Both of mine are like that. I thought they all were.
  2. And still rockin those old school dayton hubs. I like it.
  3. Part # visible. Anybody know the application?
  4. Doesn't look like that is going to happen.
  5. The 686 mounts should be the same. I have seen some from a 700. They look different. They have offset.
  6. I got these today. They look like they should work but I'm not positive they are the right ones. I saw at least 4 different rear mount styles today. Crazy.
  7. I would like to have it. You already have a 12?
  8. Sad part is that there is a market for trucks like that and no manufacturer is filling it.
  9. I have managed to scrounge up a few 2 sticks. I like em for the work we do. The multiple pto speeds and multi reverse speeds is awesome. Nevermind the fact that they are tough as boot leather.
  10. Damn if that daycab MH wouldn't make a fine lowboy tractor.
  11. Those look awfully flimsy compared to the factory jobs. Mine are still working trucks and have to be able to handle rough duty.
  12. Well done sirs. I will hunt some west coast mounts. Wish me luck.
  13. Ok, I have exhausted my other avenues of help on this issue. They didn't know shit. Lol I hope the immense amount of knowlwdge here on bmt can be brought to bear on my problem.
  14. Looks more like it. I ditch mine and go to turn signals with built in side marker.
  15. Any truck that had the round turn signal lights had to have them for side marker. R models had them too.
  16. Looks like if I flipped the mounts around, it would push the engine too far forward. The driveshaft from the trans to the carrier bearing would not be long enough. Looks like a flip would move the engine forward a couple of inches, maybe more. I don't need that much.
×
×
  • Create New...