
kscarbel2
Moderator-
Posts
18,613 -
Joined
-
Days Won
112
Everything posted by kscarbel2
-
Heavy Duty Trucking / December 30, 2015 In compliance with a provision on the new highway act, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration has withdrawn a notice of proposed rulemaking that would have amended haz-mat regulations on the transportation of “flammable liquid material in unprotected external product piping,” a.k.a. wetlines, on DOT-spec tanker trucks. The withdrawal notice was published in the Federal Register for Dec. 30. The proposal, which dates back to 2011, would have limited the amount of flammable liquid that could be carried in the unprotected loading/unloading wetlines of tankers. PHMSA had contended there was a risk that fuel held in wetlines could spill and ignite in an accident. However, tank carriers argued that the expense of installing pumps to empty the wetlines would far outweigh the benefits, especially given the added risk of explosion from welding retrofit pumps onto tank trailers. According to Gordon Delcambre, Jr., PHMSA public affairs specialist, the notice’s withdrawal was mandated by Congress in the Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act highway bill that was signed into law by President Obama earlier this month. “Although PHMSA is withdrawing its rulemaking proposal, the agency will continue to consider methods to improve the safety of transporting flammable liquid by cargo tank motor vehicle,” stated the notice. PHMSA added that it will “continue to analyze current incident data and improve the collection of future incident data to assist in making an informed decision on methods to address this issue further, if warranted.”
-
Fleet Owner / December 29, 2015 The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) has dropped its plans to require interstate carriers to display a label to document a vehicle’s compliance with all applicable Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSSs) in effect as of the date of manufacture. In a notice to be published Wednesday in the Federal Register, FMCSA says it has withdrawn the June 17 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) because subsequently filed comments “raised substantive issues” that led the agency to conclude “it would be inappropriate to move forward” with a final rule based on the proposal. “Because the FMVSSs critical to the operational safety of CMVs are cross referenced in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs), FMCSA has determined that it can most effectively ensure that motor carriers maintain the safety equipment and features provided by the FMVSSs through enforcement of the FMCSRs, making an additional FMVSS certification labeling regulation unnecessary,” the notice reads. Among the objections, commenters (including the American Trucking Assns., the Truckload Carriers Assn., the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Assn., the Truck and Engine Manufacturers Assn., and several carriers) noted that: - The rule would provide no safety benefits - FMVSS markings, particularly on trailers, are subject to damage, over-painting, and loss over the life of the vehicle. No certification marking is permanent - Many of the manufacturers have gone out of business, been purchased, or are overseas; obtaining a replacement certification or letter may not be possible - The proposal does not recognize the issues raised by interlining and other operational patterns; and - The rule would impose significant costs on carriers, which FMCSA has failed to estimate.
-
Fleet Owner / December 30, 2015 Staff Sgt. David Kirtland with the Louisiana National Guard chronicles the transportation of a 100 ft. long, 27.5 ft. high “controlled-burn chamber” from Oklahoma to Louisiana, where it will be used to safely dispose of 16 million lbs. of artillery propellant.
-
The B1 bomber - The under-appreciated workhorse of America’s air wars The Washington Pose / December 30, 2015 The huge swing-wing airplane is nothing if not flexible — canceled, revived, converted from nuclear strike plane to conventional bomber and then to flying arsenal for the GPS-guided bombs on which ground troops fighting for their lives in Iraq, Afghanistan, and now Syria often rely. And if the U.S. Air Force’s supersonic B-1 bomber is one other thing, it’s misunderstood. It’s no secret that the B-1 bomber, officially called the Lancer but known to its four-man crews as the “Bone” (they proudly call themselves “Bone-drivers”), had a troubled early life. Canceled by President Jimmy Carter and revived by successor Ronald Reagan, the B-1 underwent sweeping redesigns before it reached Air Force crews in the mid-1980s — and even then, the revamped airplane suffered a string of high-profile malfunctions and crashes. Not until 1998, three decades after the distinctive swing-wing bomber was first designed, did the B-1 first drop bombs on enemy targets in Iraq. In public forums, the B-1 has often been a punch line. A glowing New York Times feature earlier this month on the B-1’s older, slower brother, the gangly B-52, highlighted the tribulations of the supersonic bomber’s development, comparing it unfavorably to the reliable B-52 of “Dr. Strangelove” fame, which has been in uninterrupted service since the 1950s. And during a Senate hearing last year, Sen. John McCain pushed back hard on Secretary of the Air Force Deborah Lee James’s description of the B-1 as an effective airplane for “close air support,” or the delivery of precision-guided bombs in support of embattled ground troops. “That’s a remarkable statement,” McCain scoffed. “That doesn’t comport with any experience I’ve ever had, nor anyone I know has ever had.” What McCain didn’t seem to be aware of, and what the Times report failed to note, is the long third act of the B-1’s life. Converted in the 1990s from a Soviet-airspace-penetrating nuclear strike plane to a conventional bomber meant to pound the infrastructure and massed formations of an enemy army, the “Bone” converted again in the aftermath of September 11, 2001, into exactly what the Arizona senator found so hard to believe: not just a close air support plane, but, by all accounts, a hugely successful one. One need only watch this video below of a B-1 strike in Afghanistan’s ultra-violent Pech valley, and listen to the profanity-laden commentary of the ground troops doing the filming, to get a sense of the role the big bomber played supporting troops in contact in both Iraq and Afghanistan. In the video, originally uploaded to YouTube by a military spokesperson, troops at a remote firebase watch as three satellite-guided bombs from a B-1 strike mountainside targets almost simultaneously, followed seconds later by a fourth. The soldiers express their elation in not-safe-for-civilian-work terms. By the time of the airstrike depicted in the video, Bone-drivers had been flying their dark gray planes 20,000 feet over Afghanistan for years — since the opening night of the U.S.-led air war in October 2001, when five B-1s flying out of the Indian Ocean outpost of Diego Garcia joined ten B-52s and two B-2 stealth bombers in pummeling the Taliban regime’s few fixed-site targets. One pilot who flew B-1s in the early months of the Afghan war, Jordan Thomas, had been working at the Air Force’s B-1 training school the summer before the September 11 attacks when he fielded what seemed at the time like an odd inquiry from a Congressional staffer. (Part of the B-1 fleet was on the chopping block as a cost-cutting measure, making the bomber a subject of Congressional and media interest.) “This staffer asked whether it was true that the B-1 wasn’t able to fly over high mountains like in Afghanistan, which he’d read somewhere,” Thomas remembered. “I wrote back, ‘We can fly over the mountains of Afghanistan, but why on earth would we?’” Working with fellow Bone-drivers in the skies over those very mountains and back on Diego Garcia, Thomas helped the B-1 crews develop what would become their essential skill in the years ahead: coordinating with ground troops to drop firefight-ending bombs with lethal precision and accuracy. “We were given an opportunity in Afghanistan to prove what the B-1 could do,” Thomas said. The plane’s success aiding the ouster of the Taliban gained it a moment of appreciation, and saved the B-1 fleet from the cuts that defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld, a B-1 skeptic, had been pressing before the September 11 attacks. “Maligned B-1 Bomber Now Proving Its Worth,” a Los Angeles Times headline trumpeted two months into the bombing. Day-to-day coverage of the fall 2001 air campaign, though, emphasized the B-52. The B-1 was mentioned only occasionally, even though in fact, B-1s and B-52s were flying roughly equal numbers of missions — and the newer B-1s were actually outpacing their older siblings in numbers of bombs dropped, especially smart bombs. The misrepresentation bothered some of the Bone-drivers on Diego Garcia. Thomas had a theory about what was going on: because the B-52s flew mostly during daylight hours and the B-1s mostly at night, journalists accompanying the Northern Alliance troops on the ground could only see (and photograph) the B-52s, and mistakenly assumed the same planes were carrying out the night bombardments. In the years that followed, the B-1 became a mainstay of close air support and other strike missions over both Afghanistan and Iraq, where a B-1 kicked off the air war in 2003 with a string of bombs meant to kill Saddam Hussein in one of his Baghdad palaces (he wasn’t there). “We are using it in ways never conceived of previously,” secretary of the Air Force James Roche said of the B-1 later that year. Capable of flying in rougher weather than the B-52, cheaper to operate, and capable of carrying more bombs, in 2006 the B-1 displaced the B-52 and became the standard bomber deployed to support ground troops in the two wars, while the older aircraft played the traditional nuclear deterrent role. One unit whose veterans sing the B-1’s praises is the 2nd Battalion, 503rd Infantry Regiment, which, during 15 months in the Pech and adjoining Afghan valleys in 2007-8, became the most heavily decorated Army battalion of the post-September 11 wars. “Our favorite asset at the company level was the B-1,” said one of the unit’s company commanders, Lou Frketic. “They had more ordnance and longer loiter times, and they delivered ordnance to the desired location without trying to second-guess us with their own optics.” “What I loved about the B-1 was that it had such incredible payload capacity and such incredible time on station,” the battalion’s fire support officer, Jeffrey Pickler, agreed. “We dropped over a million pounds of Air Force bombs, and a lot of that was B-1s.” When insurgents attacked from rock formations high in the mountains, artillery and mortars would respond first, trying to get the enemy to take cover; then bombs from a B-1 or another airplane would smash the militants’ natural bunkers before attack helicopters arrived to pick off survivors. On one of the worst of many bad nights in the battalion’s deployment — Oct. 25, 2007, when a sharp firefight in the Korengal valley left two paratroopers dead and earned one wounded soldier the first Medal of Honor awarded to living recipient since Vietnam — it was a B-1 whose bombs shook the battle-scarred ridge, pounding the escaping insurgents. As with the AC-130 gunship that destroyed an international hospital in Afghanistan this fall, the B-1’s destructive power is a double-edged sword: if it strikes the wrong target, the damage to civilians or friendly forces can be severe. “It was like Judgment Day,” a survivor of an errant 2008 B-1 strike that killed dozens of civilians told Human Right Watch. And in June 2014, a B-1 dropped a bomb on a special operations team in Afghanistan, killing five U.S. soldiers and one Afghan. The latter error was chalked up to a misunderstanding by the bomber’s own crew of how far away the plane’s sensors could detect the ground troops’ identifying infrared strobe lights. When targeting pods with high-tech surveillance cameras were added to B-1s in 2008 (they were also fielded to the B-52), “It transformed the nature of the aircraft,” according to retired Lt. Gen. David Deptula, an airpower advocate who flew both bombers while he was on active duty. Besides dropping bombs — which they could do with greater precision, hopefully helping to cut down on civilian casualties — Bone crews gained the ability able to watch over ground troops’ shoulders for potential threats, supplementing the stressed fleet of Predator and Reaper drones designed for that purpose. The first B-1 crew to drop bombs in America’s latest air campaign over Iraq got the call one day in August 2014. Already on the runway getting ready for a routine mission over Afghanistan, according to an Air Force Times report, the crew plugged in new coordinates and headed for the skies around Baghdad to support Iraqi ground forces. As the U.S.-led bombing campaign against the Islamic State expanded, it became the focus of a full squadron of B-1s, aircraft from which, on 31 occasions during their deployment, “went Winchester,” dropping all the bombs they had on board. Of the missions where Bone-drivers dropped all their bombs, many took place over the northern Syrian city of Kobane. In an air campaign whose slow pace has drawn criticism, the four-month bombardment of Kobane stood out for its punishing tempo, and the B-1 was at the heart of it, dropping bombs at the direction of rear-area U.S. air controllers who relayed strike requests from Kurdish troops on the ground. By the time the Islamic State’s grip on Kobane broke last January, the B-1’s distinctive shape was a familiar sight in the sky above the city. The next B-1 squadron to deploy to the Middle East played a similar role supporting ground offensives by Iraqi troops in Tikrit this spring – “We kill bad people and we break their things, and we’re very good at it,” the squadron’s commander told a South Dakota journalist after the unit’s return home – and yet a third squadron’s B-1s were on hand during last month’s seizure of Sinjar, in between the Islamic State strongholds of Mosul and Raqqa, by Kurdish forces. “We focused first on northern Syria, then northeastern Iraq, then Sinjar,” the currently deployed B-1 squadron’s commander told the Washington Post. (Air Force spokespeople made the officer available on the condition that only his rank, lieutenant colonel, and first name, Joseph, be published.) “We have definitely gone Winchester many times.” The officer’s 37th Expeditionary Bomb Squadron has struck Islamic State command posts, training camps, and oil production facilities, he explained. But the most satisfying missions have been those in direct support of friendly ground troops in both countries, most recently around the embattled Iraqi city of Ramadi. That was where, in a particularly memorable recent mission, Iraqi troops requested that the squadron commander and his crew do something about small boats that Islamic State fighters were using for transport. Watching with their targeting pod, the crew waited until the boats clustered under a bridge, and then destroyed the bridge with satellite-guided bombs. “That was different,” the B-1 squadron commander said. “I never expected to be dropping ordnance on boats.” A single B-1 can drop as many bombs on Syrian and Iraqi targets as 40 attack jets flying off an aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf, noted retired Air Force general Deptula, making the bomber’s importance to the air campaign obvious. “The B-1 carries so much payload, and has so much endurance, its persistence can’t be matched by other platforms” like smaller attack jets and the B-52, he said. “It is both more effective and more efficient.” To Rep. Chris Stewart, a Congressman from Utah who was a Bone-driver before he was a politician and tries to stay up to date on his plane’s wartime employment, the prominent role B-1s play today in the campaign against the Islamic State comes as no surprise — notwithstanding the dismissal of the supersonic bomber in the recent New York Times paean to the B-52. “That article was so 1977,” Stewart joked. “Every airplane goes through a maturing process, but the B-1 has proven itself again and again, and for a long time. It’s the B-1 that’s the backbone of the bomber fleet.”
-
* Storm pushes North Pole 50 degrees above normal to melting point The Washington Pose / December 30, 2015 A powerful winter cyclone has driven the North Pole to the freezing point this week, 50 degrees above average for this time of year. From Tuesday evening to Wednesday morning, a mind-boggling pressure drop was recorded in Iceland: 54 millibars in just 18 hours. This triples the criteria for “bomb” cyclogenesis, which meteorologists use to describe a rapidly intensifying mid-latitude storm. A “bomb” cyclone is defined as dropping one millibar per hour for 24 hours. NOAA’s Ocean Prediction Center said the storm’s minimum pressure dropped to 928 millibars around 1 a.m. Eastern time, which likely places it in the top five strongest storms on record in this region. As this storm churns north, it’s forcing warm air into the Arctic Circle. Over the North Sea, sustained winds from the south are blasting at 70 mph, and gusting to well above 100 mph, drawing heat from south to north. Although there are no permanent weather stations at the North Pole (or really anywhere in the Arctic Ocean), we can use weather forecast models, which ingest data from satellites and surrounding surface observations, to estimate conditions at Earth’s most northern location. On Wednesday morning, temperatures over a vast area around North Pole were somewhere between 30 and 35 degrees Fahrenheit, and for at least a brief moment, surpassed the 32-degree threshold at exactly 90 degrees North, according to data from the GFS forecast model. Data from the International Arctic Buoy Programme confirms that temperatures very close to the North Pole surpassed the melting point on Wednesday. Buoy 64760 at a latitude of 87.45 degrees North hit a high temperature of 0.7 degrees Celsius — or 33 degrees Fahrenheit — around 8 a.m. Eastern Time. “Consider the average winter temperature there is around 20 degrees below zero,” says meteorologist Jason Samenow. A temperature around the freezing mark signifies a departure from normal of over 50 degrees, and close to typical mid-summer temperatures in this region. In other words, the area around the North Pole was about as warm as Chicago on Wednesday, and quite a few degrees warmer than much of the Midwest.
-
President Obama’s recent vetoes were unconstitutional. Congress should sue him. Robert Spitzer / The Washington Pose / December 30, 2015 There's a pocket veto, and there's a regular veto. Presidents don't get to combine them. President Obama’s vetoes earlier this month of two bills that would have blocked administration efforts to blunt climate change surprised no one. The vetoes came after Congress passed resolutions that even Republican leaders admitted were largely symbolic — precisely because the GOP lacks the votes to override Obama. By choosing an unorthodox and unnecessary method to exercise his veto, though, Obama may have handed a major victory to the Republicans by providing them with a way to challenge the constitutionality of his action. Here’s how. The Constitution provides the president with two veto options: the regular or return veto, where the president returns the bill to Congress with his objections; and the pocket veto, which kills the bill without returning it to Congress. Presidents like the pocket veto better for the obvious reason that it is absolute, with no possibility of veto override, but the Constitution does not allow presidents to pick and choose the kind of veto they wish to use. The regular veto is unconditional as long as the bill can be returned. But the pocket veto, under the terms of Article I, Section 7, has two conditions for its use: Congress must be adjourned, and bill return must be “prevented.” These two linked conditions in turn acknowledge the existence of adjournments when bill return is possible. In fact, the return veto is actually preferred by the terms of the Constitution, as was the clear intent of the Framers (Founding Fathers). We know this because at the Constitutional Convention, they repeatedly and emphatically rejected a monarchical absolute or non-override veto for the president. The right of Congress to have a final chance at vetoed bills was essential to the checks and balances system they created. Yet the pocket veto is absolute in its effect, because the bill dies without return to Congress, so how is its presence in the Constitution explained? The answer is that the pocket veto was created to prevent Congress from ducking a veto by passing a bill and quickly adjourning to prevent the president from returning the measure. Without the pocket veto, an objectionable bill would simply become law after ten days, whether the president signed it or not. So how can a regular veto be used if Congress is not in session, which it is not, since the first session of the 114th Congress ended Dec. 18? Simple: Each house designates legal agents to receive veto messages and other communications. This routine mechanism has been used thousands of times by Congress for decades during long weekends, vacations and breaks, just as the White House receives bills from Congress on behalf of the president when he is absent or indisposed. Both procedures have met constitutional muster. As the Supreme Court said in 1938, the “Constitution does not define what shall constitute a return of a bill or deny the use of appropriate agencies in effecting the return.” In his two vetoes, Obama issued a so-called “protective return pocket veto,” whereby he announced a pocket veto and titled his veto message “Memorandum of Disapproval” (the name for a pocket veto message). But he then proceeded to return the two bills to Congress — a return veto. The justification for doing so is always the same: to “leave no doubt that the bill is being vetoed.” The problem is that this gambit creates doubt because it combines two mutually exclusive actions: a regular veto and a pocket veto. Even more troubling, the history behind this veto mashup — claiming the exercise of a non-return pocket veto while simultaneously returning the bill to Congress — is a presidential power grab designed to stretch the no-override pocket veto into an absolute veto that could be used whenever Congress is not in session, giving the president the very power the Founders sought to deny the office. This practice traces to former President Gerald Ford’s administration, when the president issued five such dual vetoes. Then-Sen. Edward Kennedy challenged these vetoes in federal district court, where he prevailed. Ford halted the practice and agreed to use a pocket veto only at the end of a two-year session of Congress. Yet the practice was resuscitated by President George H.W. Bush, who claimed to pocket veto two bills that he also returned to Congress. President Bill Clinton did the same thing three times in 2000, and President George W. Bush employed the practice once in 2007. Obama, meanwhile, has used the maneuver five times out of seven total vetoes. The Republicans’ option is clear: Sue the president, arguing that the vetoes were facially unconstitutional because they combined two mutually exclusive procedures, and because Congress had designated legal agents to receive veto messages. Since Obama withheld his signature, the two bills, instead of being vetoed, should have become law without his signature after ten days. It would pain me to see Obama’s laudable efforts to reduce greenhouse gases thwarted*. But it is even more painful to see this constitutional Rube Goldberg veto device persist. Obama could and should have simply exercised the return veto, but he didn’t. It’s time to bring this practice to an end. Maybe it will take a legal victory by the president’s opponents to persuade him.
-
At any point in time, there are millions of people around the world who have been waiting in line from one to five years to legally immigrate to the United States. And yet due to a law that borders on being childish in nature, thousands of Cubans are now flooding into the United States, like the alleged Muslim “refugees”, cutting in line ahead of other people around the world. The ridiculous US policy of automatically granting Cubans express green cards should cease immediately. If they want to live in the United States and subjugate to the American way of life, then they can demonstrate some American-like ethics by getting in line for a green card like every other immigrant applicant around the globe. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 40,000 Cubans given expedited green cards, thousands more coming The Guardian / December 30, 2015 A massive airlift of refugees will begin in Central America next week after regional countries agreed to help thousands of stranded Cubans who have been driven by the threat of normalised relations to migrate to the United States. Fears that talks between Washington and Havana may soon curtail favourable US migration policies have prompted the biggest rush from the Caribbean island since the “raft exodus” of 1994. More than 40,000 Cubans have entered the US this year, almost double the number in 2014. Many more are stranded, after travelling via Ecuador, which offered visa-free entry for Cuban arrivals, and then being blocked on their overland route north at the Nicaraguan border. Since 15 November, the government in Managua, which is an ally of the Cuban president, Raúl Castro, has denied entry to the refugees. About 6,000 Cubans have been stuck in Costa Rica and Panama for the past six weeks, prompting concerns from the International Red Cross and other aid groups. Jim Batres, the national director of the Red Cross in Costa Rica said the plan was “light at the end of the tunnel”, but “may not be a complete solution to the problems we have here”. “There are still many questions. We know that 40,000 Cubans entered Ecuador, but so far only 7,000 are here in Costa Rica. What will happen to the rest? How long will the airlift take? What will happen to people who can’t afford it? This situation could continue for one, two or three months.” Last Sunday, Pope Francis, called on regional governments “to find a quick solution to this humanitarian drama”. That appeared to have been achieved on Tuesday, when seven member nations of the Central American Integration System – not including Nicaragua – agreed to arrange flights for the refugees to El Salvador. From there, they are expected to travel by bus through Guatemala and Mexico to the United States. The Costa Rican foreign minister, Manuel González, said the plan, which begins with a pilot flight next week, was “entirely exceptional” and would only apply to Cubans who currently reside in the country. Many questions remain unanswered, particularly regarding financing the plan and the role of the US in the agreement. González suggested refugees would have to pay their own way, but many are unlikely to have sufficient funds for a flight. The details have been left deliberately sketchy to avoid further inflaming regional tensions and resentment among other Latinos who would like to migrate to the US but do not enjoy the same preferential conditions as Cubans. Since 1966, the US has allowed Cuban visitors to become legal residents within a year of setting foot on US soil, as part of the old cold war strategy to destabilise the Castro government. In the wake of recent diplomatic breakthroughs, however, many fear this policy could soon come to an end. With salaries in the US dozens of times higher than those in Cuba, the economic incentive to leave before a possible tightening of the rules is enormous. The Cuban minister of foreign relations, Bruno Rodríguez, urged a quick solution to the plight of the refugees stranded in Costa Rica, which he blamed on Washington. “I strongly believe that the politicisation of US migration policy toward Cuba must change, and must stop encouraging illegal, unsafe and disorderly migration,” he told the national assembly. Costa Rica’s President Luis Guillermo Solís has also reportedly complained that countries on the Cuban migrants’ route are “victims” of US immigration policy. The extent to which the US will be part of the solution remains unclear. Although it was not one of the seven countries – Guatemala, Belize, El Salvador, Honduras, Costa Rica, Panama and Mexico – that agreed on the airlift plan, it is likely to have been closely consulted. US Congress members Kay Granger and Henry Cuellar visited Cuban refugee centres in Costa Rica on Tuesday and joined the US ambassador, Stafford Fitzgerald Haney, and the Costa Rican envoy in Washington at a meeting to discuss the crisis (Apparently, the term "crisis" can now be casually applied to almost any situation nowadays) . The host government said it was not planning to ask the US for financial or technical aid. However, private donations from the US have already begun. Another recent visitor to Costa Rica is Felix Roque, mayor of the New Jersey town of West New York, who told local reporters he had donated a six-figure sum to the refugees.
-
FOR SALE Why haven't we talked about this truck?
kscarbel2 replied to Outbehindthebarn's topic in Trucks for Sale
That HVAC system was developed by Signet Systems*. Later in the late 1980s, Mack Trucks switched to Red Dot, but the HVAC system design in the R/RD/DM and MH remained largely the same. * FYI: Signet Systems was acquired by Modine Manufacturing in 1995. The former Mack Trucks had two radiator suppliers, Modine and G&O. G&O Manufacturing was acquired by Transpro in 1970. In 2005, Modine bought the G&O unit and renamed it Modine Jackson Inc. -
MAZ Trucks Press Release / December 29, 2015 MAZ Trucks held a press-conference at the Minsk Automobile Plant on December 22, 2015 to announce the participation of the MAZ-Sport Team in the 2016 Dakar rally. 2016 marks the fifth time that the MAZ-Sport Team will participate in the Dakar rally. The MAZ-Sport Team headed out to South America on December 24. MAZ Trucks will have three trucks at the race – two main crews and a “fast technical” truck for immediate assistance during the stages. The truckmaker’s reputation will be defended by three crews: Crew no. 507: driver – Sergey Vyazovich; navigator– Pavel Garanin; mechanic – Andrey Zhigulin. Crew no. 512: driver – Alexander Vasilevski; navigator – Valery Kozlowski; mechanic – Anton Zaporoschenko. Crew no 541: driver – Vladimir Vasilevski; navigator – Dmitry Vihrenko; mechanic – Aleksey Neverovich. The specially prepared MAZ race trucks are already in Argentina. The Belarus-based MAZ team is staking its success on speed, experience, strategy and advanced truck engineering. The 2016 Dakar rally will take place in two countries – Argentina and Bolivia. The start of the race will take place on January, 3 in Buenos–Aires and the finish will be in Rosario on January, 16, 2016. 59 truck category race participants will drive 9385 kilometers (5,832 miles) over some of the toughest conditions on earth. .
-
Tatra Trucks Press Release / December 29, 2015 In 2016, Tatra Trucks will celebrate its 30th year participating in the legendary Dakar Rally. The Tatra Buggyra race team is taking part with two specially prepared Tatra race trucks. Cheer with us, place a bet and win a participation in Buggyra Camp with a Tatra race truck ride! We have prepared a special website (www.tatradakar.com) where you can find up-to-date information about the Tatra Buggyra race team, as well as an introduction to Tatra race trucks. Cheer with us and take part in our competition! Visit www.tatradakar.com, fill out a form with placing your bet on the Tatra Buggyra race team, and win a participation in Buggyra Camp where you can get behind the wheel of a Tata race truck. Follow us also at Facebook, Twitter and Instagram!
-
-
Fleet Owner / December 29, 2015 Ken-Tool has announced three new tools (http://www.kentool.com/index.php/new-products/air-brake-slack-adjusters) to make the task of adjusting drum air brake linkage to remove dangerous slack on trucks and trailers an easier task. The tools, made in the U.S.A., fit Bendix, Haldex and Meritor air braking systems. “They are ideal for a trucker’s on-the-road tool box, and truck/trailer service centers,” says Ken-Tool. “The tools, one for each brake manufacturer’s design, feature the use of durable tool-grade steel, a convenient, offset reversible ratchet design. The tools are available separately.” The two-piece Meritor Automatic Slack Adjuster Set (pn 33200) features a 5/16” double square ratchet and a tool to secure the brake shaft from turning during tightening/loosening of the adjustment nut (with heavy-duty molded resin handles), each tool weighs 10.4 oz. (0.3 kg), is 12 in. (31 cm) long, and priced at $70.95 (US) MSRP for the set. The Haldex Slack Adjuster Tool (pn 33205) uses a 7/16” double offset square ratchet, weighs 10.4 oz. (0.3 kg), is 14.5 in. (37 cm) long, and priced at $33.99 (US) MSRP. The Bendix Slack Adjuster Tool (pn 33206) uses a 9/16” double offset square ratchet, weighs 1.0 lb. (0. 5 kg), is 14.5 in. (37 cm) long, and priced at $51.50 (US) MSRP. The Haldex and Bendix tools each have extra-long handles for improved leverage, with comfortable, slip resistant vinyl hand grips. To reverse direction on the Bendix and Haldex tools, the technician turns the tool over.
-
Jay Leno's Garage - 1942 Dodge Power Wagon Restomod
kscarbel2 replied to kscarbel2's topic in Odds and Ends
Here's a World War 2 Dodge WC63 from which Legacy built this custom 6x6. Though only built as a 4x4 (1951-1968), the second generation Dodge military model M37 and civilian model WM300 represented perfection. -
CNN / December 26, 2015 An Arizona ISIS supporter has been indicted on charges of arming and training the men who tried to attack a Prophet Mohammed cartoon contest in Texas earlier this year. He sought to use pipe bombs to target last season's Super Bowl. A new indictment against Abdul Malik Abdul Kareem (aka Decarus Thomas) also accuses him of providing material support to the global terror network by accessing -- with the help of a cohort -- an ISIS document listing the names and addresses of U.S. service members. Kareem had earlier been indicted of providing arms and guidance to the two men, Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi, who were killed on May 3 attempting to attack the cartoon contest. The indictment handed down on Wednesday provided more detail on Kareem's alleged willingness to pursue violent jihad in the name of ISIS and his influence on his co-conspirators. Simpson and Soofi were shot dead by a police traffic officer who was part of the security at the Curtis Culwell Center in Garland, Texas, a Dallas suburb, the day of the Muhammad Art Exhibit and Contest. That officer was wounded but survived the assault, for which ISIS claimed responsibility. The trio began conspiring to support ISIS sometime around June 2014. Their target list included military bases, U.S. service members, shopping malls, Super Bowl XLIX in Glendale, Arizona, and the cartoon contest. The men traveled to remote desert areas near Phoenix for target practice during the first half of 2015. The indictment also accuses Kareem of transporting firearms and ammunition across state lines. Kareem faked having been struck by a car and attempted to make an insurance claim based in his injuries in order to raise money for attacks. In addition to providing arms to Simpson and Soofi, Kareem hosted the two men and others at his home to discuss the attack on the cartoon contest. For months, the trio and other men watched videos "depicting jihadist violence and apparent wartime footage in Syria, Iraq and elsewhere in the Middle East" as well "torture and executions" by ISIS members. "While watching the videos, Kareem exhorted and encouraged Simpson and Soofi to engage in violent activity in the United States to support ISIS and impose retribution for United States military actions in the Middle East," the indictment said. From December to May 2014, Kareem and others allegedly attempted to acquire pipe bombs and inquired about what type of explosives would be needed to create maximum damage at venues such as the mall at Westgate and nearby University of Phoenix Stadium, where the Super Bowl was to be played on February 1, the indictment said. On March 20, Simpson accessed an ISIS list of the home addresses of U.S. military personnel. A handwritten note found later in an apartment shared by Simpson and Sofi had the name and address of an Arizona service member targeted by ISIS. Simpson, Soofi and others also scouted military installations for planned attacks. Kareem, who was arrested last June, was charged on Wednesday with conspiracy to provide material support to a foreign terrorist organization, interstate transportation of firearms with intent to commit a felony, making false statements and other crimes. An indictment earlier this year charged him with conspiracy and weapons charges in connection with the attack in Garland. .
-
The last Autocars were built in Ogden, Utah.
-
Heavy Duty Trucking / December 28, 2015 Idaho will be allowed to increase its truck weight limit on interstate highways to as a result of a provision attached to the $1.1 trillion omnibus spending bill passed earlier this month, according to a report in Capital Press. The omnibus legislation determines the yearly budget for the federal government and is prone to riders being attached to its more than 2,000 pages to ensure that they will be passed. A provision in the bill allows Idaho to increase its truck weight limit to 129,000 pounds (58.5 metric tons) on Interstate highways. Truck weights had been limited to 105,500 pounds (47.85 metric tons) in Idaho since 1991, and the move is seen as a way to gain parity with surrounding states that have higher weight limits. Aspects of transportation like shipping costs and agricultural commodities are expected to be positively impacted by raising the weight limit. The rider was attached to the bill by Idaho Rep. Mike Simpson and Sen. Mike Crapo, according to Capital Press. "By ensuring that Idaho’s vehicle laws match those of its neighboring states, Idaho can more efficiently play a larger role in transferring goods without impacting road safety," Simpson said in a statement. "A higher weight limit means trucks will have more axles than traditional trucks," he noted, "distributing the weight in such a way that there is less weight on each axle than a standard truck. It also will reduce the number of trucks on the road." This is not the first time amendments to truck size and weight limits have been addressed by Congress. Earlier this year, the House of Representatives voted down a provision to the recently passed highway bill that would have allowed states to increase the federal vehicle weight limit to 91,000 pounds for tractor-trailers equipped with a sixth axle. In earlier versions of omnibus bill, there were attempts to add a provision allowing for 33-foot-long double trailers on highways, regardless of state laws. However, the provision was stripped from the bill by the time it reached Congress.
-
Autoblog / December 28, 2015 This is what happens when you have a serious shortage of truckers. A truck driver attempted to cross a historic bridge in Indiana on Christmas Day only to find a 136-year-old bridge that was no match for her 21.5-ton truck. Mary Lambright, who gained her CDL in May of this year, missed her exit while hauling a load of water bottles last week. After several attempts to get back on the freeway, Lambright found herself at an old iron bridge that spanned across Lick Creek in Paoli, Indiana. This bridge was not an unknown element to Lambright. After all, it was built in 1880. She told police that she had crossed the bridge while driving her personal vehicle many times, WHAS11 reported. She was also aware of the six-ton weight limit thanks to a sign posted near the entrance to the bridge. The sign even said 'no semis'. Still, she attempted to cross it in a tractor trailer with 43,000 pounds of water bottles in tow. Perhaps she was expecting a Christmas miracle. It's more likely, however, that she didn't do the math. If she had, she'd have known that 43,000 pounds equals a whopping 21.5 tons. She told police she wasn't aware of the weight of the cargo she was hauling, which seems like truck-driving 101 stuff to us. First, she lost the top of the truck thanks to the bridge's low rafters. Undeterred, she continued until the bridge then did what bridges do when they're overloaded to the extreme - it collapsed. Lambright and her 17-year-old cousin who was riding with her in the cab escaped with no injuries. She was cited for reckless operation of a tractor trailer and disregarding traffic signs. These tickets probably won't break her bank account, and Lambright will most likely be allowed by the state to keep her CDL. Her job with Louisville Logistics on the other hand, might collapse as quickly as an overladen bridge
-
FCA Press Release / December 28, 2015 75 years ago, December 29, 1940, President Franklin Roosevelt began mobilizing America’s automakers to help build and supply wartime equipment to our allies fighting in Europe. The Arsensal of Democracy speech, as it came to be called, put automakers on a new learning curve as they undertook designing and manufacturing military tanks, trucks, guns and munitions for the allies and, eventually, for the U.S. entry into World War II. Chrysler historian Brandt Rosenbusch looks back at Chrysler Corporation's participation in the war effort.
-
- 2
-
-
Trucking News / December 1, 2015 Volvo Trucks North America is recalling certain model year 2016 Volvo VNL, VNM, and VNX trucks manufactured May 11, 2015 to November 12, 2015. The affected vehicles have a two-piece steering shaft whose connecting bolt may be insufficiently tightened. As a result, the bolt may loosen and result in the two steering shafts separating causing a complete loss of steering and thereby increasing the risk of a crash. Volvo will notify owners, and dealers will inspect and tighten the steering shaft connecting bolt, free of charge. The recall began this week. Owners may contact Volvo customer service at (877) 800-4945. Volvo’s number for the recall is RVXX1512. Owners may also contact the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Vehicle Safety Hotline at (888) 327-4236, or go to www.safercar.gov. http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/acms/cs/jaxrs/download/doc/UCM491990/RCAK-15V786-1519.pdf
-
Mack engines verses Volvo/MP
kscarbel2 replied to bigblockford_390's topic in Engine and Transmission
The E7 is a great engine. But keep in mind that Volvo has no desire to support trucks (and engines) older than 15 years. -
GAZ Group Press Release / December 23, 2015
-
Transport Engineer / December 24, 2015 Transport and distribution business Moran Logistics has taken delivery of 50 new MAN TGX tractors and says it will be adding a further 80 to its fleet in 2016. The Lutterworth-based company’s additions are all TGX 26.440 tractors with XLX cabs and 12.4-litre six-cylinder engines, delivering 440bhp at 1,800 rpm. Owner Harry Moran was taken to the Munich factory by MAN to see one of his new vehicles rolling off the line. The company has 220 trucks and 330 trailers, and is a long-term MAN customer. A spokesman said: “We have tried different models in the past and we are impressed with what MAN has to offer. The whole package is attractive and there is a strong dealer network, too. “We have purchased 50 TGX 26.440 tractor units this year and we are gradually putting them in to service at our operating depots in Reading, Oswestry, Lockerbie, Manchester, Leeds, Lutterworth and Rugby. “We will be looking to add another 80 vehicles in 2016 to complement the current fleet. “MAN met the benchmark and that is why it won the tender. It has proved itself and delivered against expectations.” All the vehicles are supplied with a two-year repair and maintenance contract. .
-
Famous truck industry author Patrick Dyer's eighth book in the 'at work' series takes the reader on a journey with ERF, England's last independent truck manufacturer, between the years 1975 and 1993 with the B, C, CP and E-series trucks that the Sandbach-based company produced in the face of overwhelming competition from foreign truckmakers. Apart from the renowned economy, reliability and longevity of the products, the B, C, CP and E-series truck ranges were all linked by the remarkable SP cab, which combined a steel cage with bolt-on SMC (composite) panels. The system was so revolutionary that ERF patented it. The low cost of design and manufacture allowed it to update and improve its cabs with each series. ERF B, C, CP & E-series at Work draws on over 200 high quality photographs from the manufacturer and trucking enthusiasts, which combine with the informative text to tell the remarkable story of these ERF products through some of the most turbulent years of the company's existence. http://www.amazon.ca/Erf-E-Series-Work-Patrick-Dyer/dp/1910456101 http://www.nynehead-books.co.uk/description.php?II=2346
BigMackTrucks.com
BigMackTrucks.com is a support forum for antique, classic and modern Mack Trucks! The forum is owned and maintained by Watt's Truck Center, Inc. an independent, full service Mack dealer. The forums are not affiliated with Mack Trucks, Inc.
Our Vendors and Advertisers
Thank you for your support!