Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This is my steer axle brake can and it is leaking. Local Mack wants $1050, I did find one online for $830. Still a far cry from the $120 that I was expecting. 

Is there a cross over to a standard can or am I stuck with this part?  The Bendix Rotochamber P/N is 101260N

[url=https://postimg.cc/PpRBnq4X][img]https://i.postimg.cc/D0vFsJ4X/IMG_3333.jpg[/img][/url]

[url=https://postimg.cc/PPZ00T8H][img]https://i.postimg.cc/zXP5bfzy/IMG_3332.jpg[/img][/url]

IMG-3333.jpg

 

IMG-3332.jpg

Edited by Brandt
Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75862-steer-axle-can/
Share on other sites

If the "can" is good, open it up and replace the diaphragm:

https://www.anythingtruck.com/product/060-236528.html

Otherwise I would suggest replacing both chambers with type 24 clamp type. I think you might have trouble on inspection with one of each. Technically it should be ok, same area, but might be frowned on, being mixed.

I would keep the rotochamber if it is otherwise ok. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75862-steer-axle-can/#findComment-580841
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Joey Mack said:

Looks like 2 of us had the same thoughts.. definitely do both for even brake performance and compliance for the law man, if you have such law men in The UK.  

I believe he is in Wyoming, so same Law as you and I

I would keep the rotochamber, for two reasons, one is clearance, rotochambers are smaller in dia than clamp type of the same area, there may be clearance reasons rotochambers were used.

2nd is rotochambers are better (but way more expensive) as the force applied stays more or less constant over the stroke. As long as the "can" is serviceable, replacing the diaphragm leaves you better off. 

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75862-steer-axle-can/#findComment-580844
Share on other sites

Paul,   i screwed up. I thought it was Nathanwhit in the UK.  I git it mixed up with a local US posting..  Just letting you know that i wanted to help, but didnt do my homework first.🍻

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75862-steer-axle-can/#findComment-580849
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Joey Mack said:

Paul,   i screwed up. I thought it was Nathanwhit in the UK.  I git it mixed up with a local US posting..  Just letting you know that i wanted to help, but didnt do my homework first.🍻

not a screwup;;just an over taxed brain cells doing their best.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75862-steer-axle-can/#findComment-580857
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Joey Mack said:

I wonder if the bolt distance is the same as a modern brake chamber. Then you could put a pair of 24's on it and drive on

USUALLY  the 24'S WILL (would ) bolt up directly. main issue Use to be the position of the 24 band clamp. the 24's HAD a two bolt clamp; with today's cheaper manufacturing there may only be one bolt. Mack roto's had a felt wiper and o=ring inside.  replacing to 24's easy ?? either install the 24 on axle and using slack , back off the slack to compress inside spring.  large C-clamp to  hold canister together ;main purpose not to disturb the diaphragm.  rotate the clamp horizontal to vertical basically. or what ever position gives clearance. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75862-steer-axle-can/#findComment-580858
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
5 minutes ago, mowerman said:

I was thinking the same thing it doesn’t look like they come apart anymore used to be able to change a little cereal bowl looking thing inside. I’ve done a few of them … bob

The one he has come apart with a ring a screws around the outside to take apart.

IMG-3332.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75862-steer-axle-can/#findComment-581862
Share on other sites

those Philip screws at time are a challenge, rusted in the heads strip. do all that work only to find out the cyl has a worn ridge, another sign of the times:: older was better, just can't find those parts anymore. 2 X 24 in todays world a tad more positive ;; not better just more positive.

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75862-steer-axle-can/#findComment-581867
Share on other sites

It is not a piston that wears a ridge, If the can is solid and the screws come out, your good to go. There is no wearing contact between the piston and the outside, the bladder is a "rolling lobe" like an air bag on air ride.

 

 

Screenshot 2025-08-31 at 20-05-37 SD-02-1336_US_005.pdf.png

Edited by Geoff Weeks
add photo
Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75862-steer-axle-can/#findComment-581868
Share on other sites

to clarify , the front chamber to which I was referring used by Mack early days did not have a diaphragm as picture shows. was similar in outside design  having ring of outer philip head bolts holding it together ;;but inside had a plunger ( possibly alum) with large O-ring and felt wiper which sealed against outer shell. constant wear created a ridge inside. repair kit consist of new shell/wiper/o=ring. the 24 replaced this style.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75862-steer-axle-can/#findComment-581900
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, mechohaulic said:

to clarify , the front chamber to which I was referring used by Mack early days did not have a diaphragm as picture shows. was similar in outside design  having ring of outer philip head bolts holding it together ;;but inside had a plunger ( possibly alum) with large O-ring and felt wiper which sealed against outer shell. constant wear created a ridge inside. repair kit consist of new shell/wiper/o=ring. the 24 replaced this style.

I don't know, the O/P listed a part number which is for a Bendix rotochamber. That Bendix looks identical to the chamber in the picture. 

There were piston chambers, most I've seen are for spring brakes. Piston compresses the spring brake, diaphragm for service. 

https://www.amazon.com/Bendix-101260N-Rotochamber/dp/B0BVYDKZ4B

Edited by Geoff Weeks
Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75862-steer-axle-can/#findComment-581903
Share on other sites

It took a while but to save my sanity and prove my innocents. I found a picture of a similar NOT exact front brake chamber to which I have spoken. happens to be on ebay . the Mack number is ::19QU396P5, wagner number 103151.  old school air chamber not having contoured outer can. /ring of bolts with base; bolt protector. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75862-steer-axle-can/#findComment-581904
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...