Rob Posted November 21, 2009 Share Posted November 21, 2009 That's BSYears ago when I sometimes used unsavory language, I often used the expression "Bull S***." As I grew up a bit and discovered it was not necessary to use such crude language, that expression became "BS." What did I really mean when I used those expressions? I meant that something was ridiculous, or idiotic or a half truth or just stupid. It covered any number of negative formats. The dictionary defines it as: nonsense; especially: foolish insolent talk... I have decided that I no longer will use either of those expressions in the future. When I have a need to express such feelings, I will use the word "Pelosi." Let me use it in a sentence. "That's just a bunch of Pelosi.." I encourage you to do the same. It is such a nasty sounding word, it really packs a punch, we are no longer being vulgar, and it clearly expresses our feelings. If enough of us use it, perhaps the word could be entered into the dictionary. When on a ranch watch your step and don't step in Pelosi. It will get on the bottom of your boot and won't go away until next election. What a fitting and descriptive legacy for the Speaker of the House! PASS IT ON TO AT LEAST 10,000,000 PEOPLE. DO NOT BREAK THIS CHAIN OR YOU WILL GET MORE PELOSI THAN YOU CAN SHAKE A BULL AT. Rob Quote Plodding along with no job nor practical application for my existence, but still trying to fix what's broke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
other dog Posted November 21, 2009 Share Posted November 21, 2009 That's BSYears ago when I sometimes used unsavory language, I often used the expression "Bull S***." As I grew up a bit and discovered it was not necessary to use such crude language, that expression became "BS." What did I really mean when I used those expressions? I meant that something was ridiculous, or idiotic or a half truth or just stupid. It covered any number of negative formats. The dictionary defines it as: nonsense; especially: foolish insolent talk... I have decided that I no longer will use either of those expressions in the future. When I have a need to express such feelings, I will use the word "Pelosi." Let me use it in a sentence. "That's just a bunch of Pelosi.." I encourage you to do the same. It is such a nasty sounding word, it really packs a punch, we are no longer being vulgar, and it clearly expresses our feelings. If enough of us use it, perhaps the word could be entered into the dictionary. When on a ranch watch your step and don't step in Pelosi. It will get on the bottom of your boot and won't go away until next election. What a fitting and descriptive legacy for the Speaker of the House! PASS IT ON TO AT LEAST 10,000,000 PEOPLE. DO NOT BREAK THIS CHAIN OR YOU WILL GET MORE PELOSI THAN YOU CAN SHAKE A BULL AT. Robwhat a crock of Pelosi! I hate getting those Pelosi e-mails that say "forward to 10 people, or bad things will happen". I don't even know 10 people, so how am I supposed to pass this on to 10,000,000?...Pelosi!!! Quote Producer of poorly photo-chopped pictures since 1999. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
other dog Posted November 21, 2009 Share Posted November 21, 2009 A SIMPLE REQUEST FOR EMAILS... PLEASE THAT'S ALL I ASK...NO MORE POLITICAL EMAILS... NO MORE CHAIN EMAILS... NO MORE FORWARD AND HAVE GOOD LUCK EMAILS... NO MORE DYING CHILD EMAILS... NO MORE WALKING IN SOMEBODY'S FOOTSTEPS EMAILS... NO MORE FUNDRAISING EMAILS.... What we need is to get back to what email was designed for!!!THERE ... THATS BETTER!( uncensored version available upon request ) Quote Producer of poorly photo-chopped pictures since 1999. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swishy Posted November 23, 2009 Share Posted November 23, 2009 Ooooohhhhh L@@kyMANAGER SPECIAL 50%LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted November 23, 2009 Share Posted November 23, 2009 A SIMPLE REQUEST FOR EMAILS... PLEASE THAT'S ALL I ASK...NO MORE POLITICAL EMAILS... NO MORE CHAIN EMAILS... NO MORE FORWARD AND HAVE GOOD LUCK EMAILS... NO MORE DYING CHILD EMAILS... NO MORE WALKING IN SOMEBODY'S FOOTSTEPS EMAILS... NO MORE FUNDRAISING EMAILS.... What we need is to get back to what email was designed for!!!THERE ... THAT’S BETTER!( uncensored version available upon request ) Yea...... and no more Chuck Norris Pelosi e-mails......these are considered better and more pleasing to the human eyes. Don't ya think?....Should we take a VOTE now? mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
other dog Posted November 23, 2009 Share Posted November 23, 2009 Yea...... and no more Chuck Norris Pelosi e-mails......these are considered better and more pleasing to the human eyes. Don't ya think?....Should we take a VOTE now? mikeaye! Quote Producer of poorly photo-chopped pictures since 1999. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted November 23, 2009 Share Posted November 23, 2009 Yaw see what happens when Rob gets to thinking.....we get Pelosified. mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.