Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have a RWS that came from the factory with Reyco 102 spring.  Its pretty well worn out and i am looking to make the move to air ride.  

I have been looking for a Reyco 102 Air ride setup as that would keep it somewhat original but have had difficulty locating one in the northeast.  Anything out there? 

Thoughts on 102Air?  or should i just hunt down some Neway or Mack/Hendrickson... the marketplace seems to have options there.

Thanks

PMC

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/74953-reyco-air-ride/
Share on other sites

The Hendrickson, and the various OEM clones are about the best out there for most applications. Neway is expensive and difficult to maintain and need brackets welded onto the axle housings. Neway might be worth it for heavy haul. Easier to align than Neway.

Rayco is fine for 4 spring, and it is almost always cheaper to fix what you have then start over.

4 spring isn't so good off highway, but properly loaded, you'd be hard pressed to tell it from air ride on highway.

I ran both, 4 spring and IHC (Hendrickson) air ride.

What ever you do, run away from a Neway ARDAB suspension. No parts, expensive and always need bushings.

Edited by Geoff Weeks
Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/74953-reyco-air-ride/#findComment-565630
Share on other sites

I was one to always say keep it original and such but now im 20 years older and I feel that is not always the best advice anymore.

 

These days I would recommend a air ride that is tried and proven.  If a hobby truck Airliner is one of those options many have looked too simply for cost to buy used and cost of repair. Parts are easy to come by and the ride quality is good. only thing I would say is to make sure it has locking rears for when you are off road.  If this is a dump truck you may look at Hendrickson HAS40K air ride for heavier speced axles

I use to swear by camelback until I drove a properly speced air ride dump truck. The pete I was driving with air track / Locking rears was much better than the camelback I was use to.  sure you could louse traction if you did not put the power divider in but if you locked in it would just walk thru just about anything. With macks auto power divider you never knew if the power divider was truly working or not and you still did not have a rear axle lock so at best you had 2 wheel power and 2 wheels spinning. with manual power divider and locking rears you have 3 wheels of power and only 1 can slip. 

 

But im getting off topic now. What ever you chouse just make sure you know what your buying but I suspect anything air ride will be better than the ryco spring suspension 

 

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/74953-reyco-air-ride/#findComment-565641
Share on other sites

If mechanical RGN, then yeah, air ride is helpful with the gooseneck, being able to drop the suspension and lift back up helps.

It should be fairly easy to find Hendrickson  housings with the torque arm weldment on top. Do you have SQHP, or SQHD's? By the time SQ100's came out I think the ratio switched to 3.73.

 The reason I ask, is the rear, rear is Amboid (pinion enters above the axle centerline) on the SQHP and the housing is different then the later SQ100 (which is hypoid) essentially the rear-rear housing is "upside down".

I may have the bracket weldments off a IHC Airride, but will have to look, then getting them from Omaha to NH would be the biggest problem. That way you could use your housings and weld on the bracket. They may have got tossed in my last clean up.

Edited by Geoff Weeks
Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/74953-reyco-air-ride/#findComment-565666
Share on other sites

Some reason you don't want to put a set of 38 or 44s on camelback under it. If you are not going to be bobtailing a lot, they don't ride that bad. Air ride cabs work great too. Personally I've never had an air ride I liked. Compared to a camelback, they get stuck in spit. And if you are going to run a dump, camelbacks, Hendrickson. or some other single point suspension is really the only thing I trust to be stable

JH2.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/74953-reyco-air-ride/#findComment-565740
Share on other sites

Mechanical RGN with any spring ride is more trouble than air ride.  Walking beam Hendrickson is a great suspension, but starting from where he is starting from, either Rayco/graining  air ride or Hendrickson or one of the corp clones would be the easiest.

I don't think he is planning to put a cut-off on.

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/74953-reyco-air-ride/#findComment-565741
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Geoff Weeks said:

Mechanical RGN with any spring ride is more trouble than air ride.  Walking beam Hendrickson is a great suspension, but starting from where he is starting from, either Rayco/graining  air ride or Hendrickson or one of the corp clones would be the easiest.

I don't think he is planning to put a cut-off on.

I didn't know he was running a mechanical detach

JH2.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/74953-reyco-air-ride/#findComment-565742
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

No oil filter.  Pretty sure is QHR.

Trailer is a ground bearing eager beaver 35 ton with a hydraulic removable neck.  I also move a pintle hitch tag trailer at times. 

 I intend to keep the original frame/wheelbase and change suspension or suspension+axles by drilling new holes/welding old ones.  

Looked at a airliner yesterday that the frame rails were about an 3/4 inch narrower.  My truck is 34.25 outside/outside and the cutoff was 33.5

qhr.jpg

Edited by PMC
Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/74953-reyco-air-ride/#findComment-565760
Share on other sites

Hyd detach, if ground  bearing or not, spring is fine.

Nothing wrong with the Rayco air, it looks like a Hendrichson clone. just hard to find I suspect.

One thing to be careful about, if the mounts need to be moved, so does the crossmember. If only moved a small bit, it means holes welded and new holes in a limited area and that can weaken the frame.

Personally, I don't think the change is worth the trouble. 4 spring is simple and has few wearing parts. Not the best suspension, I'll agree but dead simple, doesn't need bushed torque rods, which are always a maintance problem on all air suspensions. 

People over estimate air suspension comfort. All trucks have air bags between them and the road, they are called tires and you can see how well they do!

If the issue is my comfort, air suspended cab will do much more for ride comfort than air truck suspension.

I had a short wheelbase tractor on walking beam, mechanical T bar drivers seat, but suspended cab (coil spring cab suspension) and it was very livable. If the wheel base was longer, it would make far bigger difference than if the rear axles were on air.

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/74953-reyco-air-ride/#findComment-565762
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Joseph Cummings said:

Some reason you don't want to put a set of 38 or 44s on camelback under it. If you are not going to be bobtailing a lot, they don't ride that bad. Air ride cabs work great too. Personally I've never had an air ride I liked. Compared to a camelback, they get stuck in spit. And if you are going to run a dump, camelbacks, Hendrickson. or some other single point suspension is really the only thing I trust to be stable

Camel back is a great option but i figure if I am going to go through all the work, I might as well go for the best ride for a highway truck.

Cab already has air ride. 

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/74953-reyco-air-ride/#findComment-565788
Share on other sites

SQHD's don't have the best reputation, I know one guy who calls the "sure-quitter's". They have an idler gear between the power divider and the front pinion. Later SQHP's and SQ100's don't. They beefed up the powerdivider section and eliminated the idler gear.

They are way obsolete, Heck, the SQHP and SQ100's are obsolete. The 3.70 gear ratio is also not made anymore, they went from a 40-10 (40 tooth ring gear, 10 tooth pinion) to 41-11 for 3.73 ratio so finding gearsets (should they be needed) may be a problem.

Before making one big change that would require a lot, it may be time to re-assess and decide if you want to stay with that model and ratio or if you want a whole new cut-off, or just repair what you have.

Later SQ100 housings will not be right either I don't think, so you'll be needed SQHD housings unless you weld brackets to what you have now.

The SQHD's both pinions turn the same direction and are on the same side of the ring gear (front and back) SQHP, and SQ100's the front pinion turns the opposite driveshaft rotation on the front and are on the opposite side of the ring gear.

SQHP rear-rear is amboid (essentially turned  upside down) with the pinion above the centerline, SQ100, they went back to the lower hypoid gearset with the rear-rear pinion below the center-line.

All this means is although all the models are related, the housings can be different for the different models.

edit: Hadn't had my coffee when I posted the teeth count! 3.70 is 37-10

Edited by Geoff Weeks
correct tooth count
Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/74953-reyco-air-ride/#findComment-565792
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Geoff Weeks said:

a whole new cut-off

That is what I always did when changing suspension types. That way you have everything you need. 

JH2.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/74953-reyco-air-ride/#findComment-565799
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...