Jump to content

Outbehindthebarn

Pedigreed Bulldog
  • Posts

    1,005
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Outbehindthebarn

  1. I have a 12 speed with the second gear shift (not on air). It is gated so it can only be used in 1st gear as it should.... The question is, can this be worked around so that shifting through all five gears in the main transmission is possible? 

  2. 50 minutes ago, mrsmackpaul said:

    I think the very first thing would be to determine were the metal came from in the oil and what causef it to fail

    If the diffs have 3 million miles I wouldn't class them as weak

    If they have only done heavy haulage with  half a million miles on them, then they probably aren't 

    If they pulled truck loads of sail boat fuel and have 100,000 miles then maybe they are weak

    If they were run low on oil or driven by a rough bastard they probably aren't weak

    With out knowing the history it's pretty hard to make a call

    Also if your rebuilding one center, I guess now is the ideal time to change the ratio to something to really suit what you want

    3.87 would be no good for me, I wouldn't have the power to shift loads quick enough 

    E9, even in it's smallest power size is still a lot more power than me 

     

    Paul

    The truck is new to me, I have no real first hand knowledge about how it was driven or what it hauled. But when I pulled drain plug found metal (fingernail size pieces). The gear set in it was pitting, flaking, chipping: it was a matter of time. I began to hunt around for a replacement 3.87 crdp92 and nobody had one within a 100 miles.... I actually had a guy tell me he had remanned 3.86 to sell, and that I could just use that... small difference he said. Another guy said he was crazy, totally different .. Which led me to wonder why Mack offered such similar ratios... 

    Then a guy on facebook replied:   "I'm sure someone will correct me but from my understanding 3.87 was a weak gear set, most notably the spur gear. Subtle changes were made to make it stronger and the set wound up being 3.86. 4.17 and 3.86 use the same spur gear and 3.87 and 3.65 share the same spur gear, the last 2 being weaker."

    My rebuilding shop agreed with the above statement at least as far as the "weak gear set" comment.

    Any truth to this?? I haven't a clue.

    He can order new parts to rebuild my crdp92 as a 3.87.. total cost around $2000.+

    I found a set of carriers with 4.17's in them used for $500..

     

     

     

  3. 1 hour ago, kscarbel2 said:

    The 4.17 harkens back to a tractor with a 237 and 5-speed. With a 300/5-speed, then a 3.87.

    The 4.42 was my go-to for a 10-speed T2100, at the bottom of the fuel curve at speed.

    What's your 'go-to' for an E9 12 speed OD with 11r24.5's in a road tractor? It currently has 3.87's, but I've never worked it... yet. Found metal on drain plug on the crdp92, so I pulled it... gear set is toast.

    Rebuilder is shying away from replacing the 3.87 ratio. He called it a "weak gear set". I have zero experience with that sort of thing. He's steering me towards 4.42 or 4.17. 

    That's the reason I asked about the closeness of the 3.86-3.87. .. and why he calls it a "weak gear set". 

  4. On 6/4/2015 at 7:02 PM, kscarbel2 said:

    I like a 4.42 ratio, but 4.17 will accomplish what your want.

    3.87 (not 3.86) would be to high (low numerically).

    Can you speak as to why two such similar ratios were offered?

  5. On 4/17/2013 at 6:53 PM, hillconst1 said:

    Anybody else notice that the E9 predecessor was an option F735 ET1005? How did they get it in the frame? Never saw this listed as an option in any truck other than superliner or cruiseliner.

    Yeah!? How about that? Very interesting.  I’ve never studied on a 865/6 V8 engine mounting to see how it compares to the E9, perhaps it would fit?

  6. On 2/9/2022 at 11:51 PM, BOBWhite said:

    My favorite part about the western models in the interior, specifically the bulldog with the cowboy hat might just be the coolest symbol on any truck!  Also after reading some of the literature on these I have to ask why the early E9 have twin turbos? A buddy north of me has a superliner with the E9 (which I envy) and it only has one turbo. When did they switch?  thanksE6E5B277-701B-4125-AAFD-299669C39A5E.thumb.jpeg.2b7a18d8fc4d0f756f4b45940513862f.jpeg

    You may be thinking of the early V8, the 864(?). I believe it was available in twin turbo form. But I'm fairly certain the E9 was a single turbo only engine for Mack truck operation.

  7. On 3/7/2014 at 8:28 PM, ClassicTVMan1981X said:

    I am wondering if the F12 and F16 would've been likely competitors to the domestic class 8 COE segment that included the White Road Commander, the Freightliner COE, the Kenworth K100/Peterbilt 352/362, GMC Astro 9500 and the Ford Louisville CL(T)9000?

    ~Ben

    F16's on American roads would have caused quite a stir. Joining in the fun of BIG power in the USA at that time.

  8. On 11/8/2022 at 9:43 AM, Rusty Dog said:

    Is this road boss still for sale?

    No.. He scrapped it. I was just there last week.. It was pretty rough, would have taken quite a lot to get roadworthy... but the hood was good. No title and wanted $2500. 

  9. I tried to buy that Road Boss at least ten years ago. Guy that owned it was a contractor for fedex. Had all kinds of old iron. Farm equipment etc. I don’t think he really wanted to sell it even though it was advertised .. more like someone was onhis neck to let stuff go. Something was the matter with the clutch, truck wouldn’t move 

×
×
  • Create New...