Jump to content

bbigrig

Pedigreed Bulldog
  • Posts

    1,086
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by bbigrig

  1. Mack was a good truck into the 90's. Then the product went thud in 98 with the E-tech engine. I know lots of fleets that bought into the CH product mid 90's only to inherit the E-tech and be very disappointed in its engine replacment. What it had issues with in competing with other manufacturers was price. Big fleets wanted big price cuts. Most were willing to slash to get in the door.

    • Like 1
  2. We had a few 89 CS200's. For some reason they (blue haze) smoked for ever with low mileage (200,000kms) but you couldn't kill them if you wanted to. Ours didn't have an oil consumption problem but as they warmed up they smoked a little bit less. Being city trucks they didn't work real hard and idled a fair bit. If you dont have an oil consumption problem it's most likely glazed cylinder walls or weak/leaking injector nozzles. Being an 89 it probably has a crap load of idle time, it's probably due for both an inframe and injector replacement. Parts will be expensive and possibly difficult to find. Only our 89' had that issue. I think it was the 06.02.12 Renault engine. None of the other Midliners we had ranging from 89-99 model years had that issue. It may be the engines from that period had blue smoking issues.

  3. No production E9's with electronic controls were ever made available in North America to customers. Only in Australia was an E9 available with V-Mac controls for purchase. I'm sure there were demo units outh there but not for sale. I'm not 100% sure but European Renault Magnums may not have either. They went from E9 V8 power down to E-tech in the late 90's just like North America.

  4. Mack Buses were quite common here in Canada especially in Toronto. The Toronto Transit Commission (Wrenching at the TTC is my full time job) was a big user of Mack over the years. The last Macks in the fleet lasted until the late 60's. Just so Happens that Alfred Pelletier former Head of Mack was a Mechanic at the TTC for years before he started working for Mack Trucks.

    post-4266-0-48294700-1453399620_thumb.jp

    post-4266-0-75805700-1453399652_thumb.jp

    • Like 2
  5. Same basic engine as the E-Tech (98-2003) engine. They added and EGR valve, EGR cooler, more sensors, vane turbo, bigger cooling system and more hassles. They really didn't work out many issues until it was replaced with newer issues in the MP series of engines.

  6. If it's a CH and not a CX (vision)

    The late 03 Visions had an ASET engine with a vane turbo charger which would have an actuator. The 03'CH's had a waste gated turbo charger on the 427/460's. Or was it just the 460's. The waste gate dumps excessive boost when it opens.

    Just asking because if I remember correctly, both set ups were available in 03. The CH with a non egr/vgt engine. The CX with an egr/vgt engine depending on build date in 03.

  7. The derate on the engines has everything to do with the emission regulations. Aussie rates will decrease slightly as emissions regs increase. Just like in North America. You need a more complete burn per cylinder for more power. Higher in cylinder Temps produce more NOX emissions. EGR reduces in Cyl Temps which curb NOX emissions. Or like more commonly today DEF/urea treats NOX after cylinder. It's all relative. All while engine manufacturers are trying to keep fuel consumption down. Older EGR engines had to up there RPM operating range to compensate for loss of power in the bottom end caused by EGR induction. Newer engines have reduced use of EGR because emissions are treated after the engine. Which in turn has brought operating ranges back into lower rpm's

  8. 89-98 E7 PLN (VMAC 1-2)

    98-02 E7 E-tech EUP (VMAC 3)

    02-07 E7 ASET EUP egr AC/AI (VMAC 4)

    07-08 MP7 egr no DPF (VMAC 5)

    08-10 MP7 MP8 egr plus DPF

    10-present MP7 MP8 EGR DPF SCR

    The above years of production are not build dates but emissions standards the engines were built to. Example being 2010 emissions were not in production till 2011.

    • Like 1
  9. Even the cab almost seems like it's a replacement. It's so damn clean. I don't think iv ever seen the old brake valving plumbed with only a yellow and red valve. That system from factory should have the blue valve. Unless someone fitted a cab that was off off straight truck and added a trailer supply but didn't bother plumbing in the tractor park valve. This truck seems really odd. Nice truck though.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...