james j neiweem Posted August 29 Share Posted August 29 What was the END 707 and how did it differ from the END673 and END 711? Not to be confused with the EN 707 Gas engine. Quote Link to comment https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75909-end-707/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
terry Posted August 29 Share Posted August 29 Good question, I’ve wondered the same thing. terry Quote Link to comment https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75909-end-707/#findComment-581703 Share on other sites More sharing options...
james j neiweem Posted September 4 Author Share Posted September 4 Terry I solved the problem with the END 707. It seems that the END 711 had 707 cu. in displacement. Thus no END 707. This is how we got sidetracked I guess. May be Mack wanted to further differentiate it from the EN 707. I am wondering if the END 711 problems were finally worked out before the END 675C and Maxidyne ran it out of town.🙂 1 Quote Link to comment https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/topic/75909-end-707/#findComment-582103 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.