Jump to content

j hancock

BMT Benefactor
  • Posts

    13,372
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    524

Posts posted by j hancock

  1. On 1/3/2019 at 9:06 PM, Maxidyne said:

    686 has the engine mounted intercooler, 690 has the chassis mounted intercooler in front of the radiator.

    The Mack engine designation 86 represented the use of ENDT676, EM6 285 or EM6 300 engines over the course of the production run.  Early models used the Tip Turbine mounted on the engine for cooling the air charge.  The front mounted charge cooler replaced the Tip Turbine around 1982 on most models.  DM686 models continued longer with the Tip Turbine until 1988, for example.

    Engine designation 90 indicates the use of the EM6 300 (early), EM7 250 HP Econodyne or EM7 300.  

    • Like 2
  2. 10 hours ago, Red Horse said:

    Jim-so if I recall your pal's 650 is a gas  job? Is he satisfied with his decision to stick with gas?  Supposedly the V-10 will be history replaced by a new 7.3L gas V-8-or so the rumor is.

    By the way-you sure that 550 is not a 2018?.  Someone told me no gasser in 550 for 2019-which lends credibility to the the 7.3 rumor as if they are not ready to release that motor, not likely they would continue to offer the V-10 then dump it in the middle of the model year.

     

    His feedback has been positive on the V10.  Knock on wood that it will continue considering he now has two of them!  The previous rollback was Duramax powered and it was having glitchy issues and he was getting sick of chasing stuff.  Quality Delphi harnesses?  Plus something was up with the pump.

    I will double check the jamb sticker for the assy. date next time I am over that way.  I asked him on Wed. if it was an 18 or 19 and it sounded like he said 19 to me.  Maybe the salesman told him it is a 2019?  It was built at the Jerr-Dan factory in PA and then shipped to Crawford's and then del. on Friday.

  3. On 12/30/2018 at 4:10 PM, JoeH said:

    Those are sweet dimensions. Do you have those drawings for a 1995 rd688s? 228" wheelbase? Does Canadian spread tandem have the same turning radius as the closer set American tandem with same wheelbase?

    I don't have a 1995.  The link is for a 2002 RD with a 210" wb. It is as close as I have.  The 2002 spec sheet doesn't list the turning radius.

    All else being equal, I believe the US and Canadian spread would have the same turning radius because the 228" wb is at the center of the suspension for both examples.

    https://www.bigmacktrucks.com/tutorials/article/214-2002-mack-rd600-dimensions/

     

×
×
  • Create New...