Jump to content

B61TENDT711

Bulldog
  • Posts

    173
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by B61TENDT711

  1. Huh? I'm lost!

    You said your dad could rebuild a 350 in 24 hours. . .

    I was just stating my 350's could not have been rebuilt ! they all seemed to spin #7 rod bearing and bust a whole in the block . . .

    There for leading to my comment of you can't weld up the holes in the block !

    still confused ?

    Mike

  2. I don't much care for automatic Transmissions myself all across the board.

    But i have to Admit GM's automatic transmissions have seem to Last under me.

    I have increased my reliability by simply not Buying GM's powered by 350's and not buying Fords driven by automatics, and Not buying Dodge's at all . . .

    EDIT:

    If you'll notice i have 2 AMC's 2 GMC's and 2 Mack's :thumb:

    Only the best repeat themselves :SMOKIE-LFT:

    Mike

  3. Now as for the GM v.s. Ford ?

    Every GM 350 i've had has blown up and every Ford automatic transmission i've had has failed.

    I don't know as either brand really Likes ME :thumb:

    I kept what held up, and recycled the ones that didn't.

    I have had the best reliability from vehicles the in the 1952-1978 year range and the most trouble in the 1984+ year range for all brands !

    Now with every rule there is exceptions, My 1988 AMC Jeep hasn't given me a lick of trouble and my 1961 Dodge D400 had tons of electrical issues . . .

    I have say there is 1 Brand i have never had to fix and that was AMC i haven't had break down with the 69' AMX nor have i had a break down with the 88" Jeep MJ.

    AMC no problems to report.

    Studebaker minor issue's nothing major.

    Mack Minor issue's nothing major.

    GM engine failures.

    Ford Transmission failures.

    Dodge Minor drive train failures Major chassie n suspension failures.

    Top most reliable #1 AMC #2 Studebaker #3 Mack . . .there's my vehicular history . . .

    Mike

  4. They all have their strong, and weak points. Don't know how many front ends I've rebuilt under GM, Dodge, and Ford pickups. From a collision repair standpoint I see no real differences in the way they are constructed.

    Personally I prefered Dodge when I purchased my truck new in 1996. It was a good choice I still depend upon. When I decide to replace this truck I will probably rebuild an older one with a mechanical diesel engine that is hopped up a little. Nothing out there currently really sparks my interest.

    I am drawn towards restoring a B model Mack with a modern running gear using either a 5.9, or 8.3 Cummins although I've owned neither engine in the past.

    Rob

    I'd use the FL-70 Chassie myself with the 8.3L Cummins and 5aspd manual trans, how ever the 5.9L 7spd manual trans powered FL-70 is an ok truck as well just a bit doggy. . .

    The 5.9L fine engine lots of rev's will run 3,000rpm all day long and make some decent power with work. . .

    The 8.3L fine durable engine makes lots of power with hardly any work at all,it's limited on the revs but it'll run 2,500rpm all day long. . .

    Option 1 fast in highest top speed n doggy under load or option 2 slow in top speed n powerful under load. . .

    the Commercial 12 valve 5.9L Specs:

    190hp n 520tq.

    210hp n 600tq.

    230hp n 660tq.

    The pick up engines where detuned 160hp-215hp 400tq-460tq yet there more sought after as nobody realizes the 5.9L is a medium duty engine detuned for light duty app's so there for your paying more money for less power seems foolish to me . ..

    Go with a Medium duty app 5.9 pay less for it and have more power. . . :clap:

    Mike

  5. WOW . . . AWESOME ! I wished my truck looked half that good when i got it . . . :angry:

    My truck started out a LOT ! ! ! worse rust dent's wholes rotten steal missing parts broken glass engine with no oil cap crank case full of water. . .

    you got tires with tread and side walls ! . . . I had bald cord's popping out tubes sticking threw almost off of them where flat !

    they had more crack's then rubber, some how with 4 fresh batteries a sheet of ply wood and several gallons of oil and a boat tank full of diesel fuel i got it to fire up and drive home . . . Tho it it blew out 4 tires on the way there 2 tires on each axle held air long enough to roll on home most of which blew out the following morning when the summer sun came out !

    Months n months $1000 bill after $1000 bill i finally i had a truck almost as good as your's . . .

    :clap: Great find :clap: you lucky devil you :thumb:

    Mike

  6. Most Gasser's of the time period normally have a cruising range of 2900-3100rpm, from what i was told tho they were designed to run 2800-3200rpm, but its been my exp they run there best floating between 2900-3100rpm. . .

    Edit:

    you also have to remember them 12.00-24/12.00R24's are about 50" tall.

    i would go from the 9.00-20's to 11.00-20's ,myself that's is what i did to my Studebaker M275Gasser its runs 66mph instead of only doing 55mph.

    Mike

  7. According to the Rpm + tire size + mph i got about a .70 OD in the 15spd. . .

    5spd-OD n 3spd-OD ? . . . 5spd w/ 5th .85:1 + 3spd 3rd .85:1 ?

    .85-1.00 = .15x2 = .30 30% OD . . .

    Edit:

    I wounder if this whole bloody truck wasn't a customized build ?

    711 Diesel with a turbo charger,2 stick 15spd with about .70 OD, 6.38 Gearing, and 12.00-24 tires . . .

    Truck runs 65mph@2,000rpm which would require a 30% or .70 OD ratio.

    Mike

  8. So Mack & Va vva va va vva I can't say it is now going to be Known as "North American truck" ?

    So its going to be a GMC/Chevy 1 plant 2 assembly lines ? Brand A on line 1 brand B on line 2 ?

    Now the only issue i see there is since 1975+ GMC and chevy have been 95% identical trucks, tho yes the GMC came with few things standard that were up charged add on's for the chevy counter part, but still you get the idea. . .

    Are we going to end up with Vava looking sally Mack ? or are we going to be Getting a tougher stronger Vava ?

    I could see it going either way. . .

    I'd rather see them stay 100% to there own then have Mack out do Va va n watch va va bankrupt itself trying to catch Mack. .

    Mike

  9. :SMOKIE-LFT:

    I've been having trouble with the "smoothly" part of the program,which I've narrowed down to:

    The wrong lube in the secondary box.

    Maladjusted,loose,badly aligned linkage on the secondary box.

    Possibly a shortage of coordination at the shift knob end of the shifters. :wacko:

    I still maintain that part of it is in how quickly this engine picks up and drops rpm's,leaving a significantly narrower "window" to make a clean shift. Maybe if I change the leverage ratio to require a little more gas pedal travel to reach full throttle,I could make the engine speed a little more controllable.

    Or,maybe I just need to squirrel up the money to license,insure and fuel the truck and just drive it full time for a while,hopefully get used to it and get better with the "smoother" part of the program. :idunno:

    Speed

    :SMOKIE-RT:

    i watched many other guys drive these before i bought mine, but yes once i got it i drove it every place to work to the store out to eat :blink: every place i went it went for about 4 or 5months. . .

    Most young guys get confused on a 5spd car or pickup truck i take some pride in being a young lad of 27 that can drive 2 stick Mack rather well i skill i learned at age 19.

    Mike

  10. That is correct, and it would burn holes in the pistons eventually too if lugged too often or too long.

    That's why I said in the previous post "The key is to use the proper technique and timing so you don't "hang out" in double neutral too long. You gotta know what to do,and get 'er done quickly and smoothly"

    I can honestly say that even when I was a kid, learning how to do this stuff, I never had to come to a stop and start over due to a missed shift. There is always a way to get back in gear as long as you go for a gear that corresponds to the current road speed and engine RPM.

    .

    If you'll also notice I said "i heard horror stories of" i heard all of the what not to do's and i sat back and watched few different guys shift these trucks before i bought one myself as to not damage it.

    Not point in buying a Rig you can't drive right ?

    Mike

×
×
  • Create New...