kscarbel2

The US and Europe are attempting to move too far and too fast with truck exhaust emissions. Also, it’s time for the U.S. to join the entire rest of the world and use the Euro emissions standards. If the entire world from tomorrow was Euro-3 (roughly EPA1998), we could all breath clean air. Euro-3 is extremely clean. Compared to the trucks of the 1970s, Euro-3 is light years ahead. And yet, it is a reasonable balance of clean emissions, reliability and fuel economy. The Euro-3 engine's electronically-controlled high pressure common rail fuel injection system is a vast improvement of the old American and Robert Bosch in-line fuel pump, allowing for significantly reduced emissions. EPA2007 and EPA2010 were/are an experiment at the expense of heavy truck operators. In the interest of cooperation, I'd be willing to accept standardizing on Euro-4 emissions levels (roughly EPA2004), if accomplished with SCR, a reasonably reliable and trouble-free technology. The decision to reach EPA2007 with heavy EGR was a costly mistake (experiment). It should have been accomplished with a combination of SCR and light EGR.

In India, they're still running Cummins B series engines in many heavy trucks. It's a poor market, but still with heavy truck needs. With care, the trucks get the job done. The China market is maturing at an amazing speed, and overloading is beginning to be controlled. But still, most of the trucks are run hard. Ten plus years ago, the 6-7 liter engines did have short 3 year lives. However the technology level of chinese heavy trucks has ramped up at a staggering rate. Today's 9 to 13 liter engines approach the durability of the global brand heavy truck engines.

Great Thread. I only wish it was under the Modern Mack discussion rather than the Antique thread. When you consider the Freightliner Argosy 2, Kenworth K200 and International 9800i sold today (in global markets), an updated Ultra-Liner or a totally evolved Ultra-Liner II would be a far superior truck. The Ultra-Liner was extremely advanced in engineering, and arguably the safest COE cab design still to this day. The Ultra-Liner could easily have been developed forward to remain a cutting edge product in the global COE market.

Diesel News / February 18, 2014 Talking to an audience of analysts and journalists at the earnings call for the Penske Automotive Group in the USA this week, company chairman and CEO Roger Penske spoke on the company’s move into Australia after the purchase of the of Transpacific’s Commercial Vehicle Group, which imports and sells the Western Star, MAN and Dennis Eagle brands in Australia. The organization is now known as Penske Commercial Vehicles. “Turning to Penske Commercial Vehicles, the fourth quarter reflected our first full quarter of operations for the commercial vehicle business and we continue to be very pleased with the initial results,” said Penske. “For the fourth quarter, the commercial vehicle business generated approximately $100 million in revenue. The heavy duty truck markets sold 11,000 units in Australia last year and our brands represented 11.7 percent market share.” “We also have a 10.3 percent market share in the Australian bus market. We believe this business is a tremendous opportunity for the company to grow revenue profitability, while further diversifying the overall footprint of our business.” “I think we remain opportunistic in the U.S. we also look at brands and where we have scale, as we’ve been in Australia, we were there last week, there was lots interest coming to us on the automotive side, I think we run the play with commercial vehicles here for a while before we jump into retail auto but there is a lot of opportunity there.” .

Sure, the software is naturally slightly different, because the Mack brand has their Maxidyne, Econodyne and Maxi-Cruise power profiles as opposed to Volvos. But the engines are the same. You mentioned EGR coolers. They are the same, painted a different color. (For example, as shown on the Volvo and Mack EGR cooler replacement bulletins below for the D13/MP8. The exact same service bulletin, just a different brand name in the upper left corner). http://www.volvotrucksemedia.com/ProductDetail.aspx?ProductId=7419&GroupId=-1 Click on "View File" https://www.macktrucksemedia.com/ProductDetail.aspx?ProductId=7440&GroupId=-1 Click on "View File" These engines run the exact same Volvo SCR system with a light to heavy EGR rate of 18% to 28%.

In situations like this with smaller displacement engines that would inherently have unacceptably low engine braking performance, I'll spec a ZF transmission with their integrally mounted retarder. . http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXQPPTvx4Ew http://www.zf.com/corporate/en/products/product_range/commercial_vehicles/trucks_intarder.shtml

Jumping ahead to the early 1970s, these Mack COE concepts weren’t far off. Note the embedded side vertical cab access hand rail for enhanced aerodynamics and reduced wind noise, a feature later seen on the still cutting edge Mack MH Ultra-Liner. .

It’s always interesting to revisit how the future direction of truck design was imagined at certain points of time. GM was always leaning into the future throughout the 1950s and 1960s, not only in car and truck design, but also in the home (Frigidaire). The Bison III and Turbo Titan III were great examples. http://www.bigmacktrucks.com/index.php?/topic/31891-the-gas-turbine-general-motors-bison-iii/ http://www.bigmacktrucks.com/index.php?/topic/31898-the-gas-turbine-chevrolet-turbo-titan-iii/ But sadly, no new products were in the pipeline for GMC Truck during the 1970s aside from the General. The Astro and Brigadier languished on And Ford certainly was stepping forward with Big Red. http://www.bigmacktrucks.com/index.php?/topic/32038-fords-futuristic-gas-turbine-big-red/ This was the era when American could do anything. We led the world in innovation. We even thought that we could put a man on the moon.......and did. What has happened to the country we once knew, where foreign truckmakers now dominate our heavy truck market?

A possible future direction for trucking, as envisioned in the early 1930s. .

In Brazil, VW has an impresssive 30 percent market share. While their largest offering there is 8.9 liters, Scania is there with all engine sizes, as is DAF, Ford, Iveco, Mercedes-Benz, Navistar and Volvo. Still the average engine size is 9-11 liters. In China, 11 liters is now the norm and 12-13 liter engines are selling. In a few years, they'll have 15-liter powerplants. Remember, you can always get around cubic inches with gears and low (high numerically) axle ratios. The Indian market and China 10+ years ago were classic examples of that.

Remember, Brazil is running B-trains (known as Interlinks in South Africa and B-doubles in Australia). And in China, 110,000 to 132,000 pound loads with 6x4 tractors paired with tri-axle trailers is normal. And when you get into the northern mining regions, you'll see ore hauling road trains that gross 375,000 pounds. These trucks never get out of the first three gears.

Essentially both Volvo and Mack on-highway trucks have the same chassis, SCR-equipped powertrains, AMT transmission (I-Shift/mDrive that you want) and warranties* (see below). It is troubling that neither brand is proud enough of their new vehicle warranties to display them on their websites (Under a tab labeled “Why buy Mack/Volvo?). A customer shouldn’t have to “Google search” in order to dig up this particularly important information. Apparently they don’t feel strongly about their warranties. Having narrowed your new truck search to Mack and Volvo, and wanting the AMT and air ride suspension**, the difference between the trucks is largely limited to the cab (Both Mack and Volvo promote Meritor drive axles on their on-highway models). So finally, it may be the differing cab design styles that influences your purchase decision. Seeing the writing on the wall when Volvo acquired Mack, most Mack distributors aggressively pursued purchasing the Volvo franchises in their sales territories. As a result, after-sales support representation for either brand is roughly the same. *Mack and Volvo New Vehicle Warranties http://www.macktrucks.com/assets/mack/Service/US10OperatorManuals/PV776-21502481.pdf https://www.volvotrucksemedia.com/ProductDetail.aspx?ProductId=10259&GroupId=542 (click on “View File”) ** The Mack-branded Twin-Y air suspension and Volvo-branded “Blade” air suspension are the same product.

The gentleman asked me a question, and I merely answered him. Problem? Mack Trucks was not a foreign entity "decades ago". Renault did not acquire Mack Trucks until 1990, after which, as a result of the "proposed" Renault-Volvo merger (that ended up collapsing because of Volvo), Volvo gained the ability to absorb Mack. During the 1980s when Renault was only a minority stake holder in Mack, Renault supported Mack's growth as the independent U.S. truckmaker it had always been. The ownership of Mack is an extremely valid topic. Anyone not interested in posts mentioning that subject can easily and painlessly skip over them.

Launched last fall at the Fenatran international transport exhibition in Sao Paulo, Brazil, MAN Latin America now has a 420 horsepower powerplant option for its Volkswagen Constellation heavy tractors. 19.420 4x2 56-ton GCW 25.420 6x2 56-ton GCW 26.420 6x4 63-ton GCW Powered by an electronically-controlled 8.9-liter 420 horsepower Cummins ISL with 1,850 N.m (1,364 lb/ft) of torque, the powertrain is paired with a 16-speed ZF AS Tronic AMT (automated manual transmission). The Euro-5 spec engines utilize SCR (selective catalytic reduction) technology to meet Euro-5 emissions. The new range of tractors is GCW-rated up to 63 metric tons (138,891 lb). Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2rGxXLtFt0 19.420 4x2: http://www.man-la.com/images/stories/produtos/caminhao/ficha_tecnica/pdf/16605/Constellation%2019420%20Tractor%20V%20Tronic%20low.pdf 25.420 6x2: http://www.man-la.com/images/stories/produtos/caminhao/ficha_tecnica/pdf/16607/Constellation%2025420%20Tractor%20V%20Tronic%20low.pdf 26.420 6x4: http://www.man-la.com/images/stories/produtos/caminhao/ficha_tecnica/pdf/16609/Constellation%2026420%20Tractor%20V%20Tronic%20low.pdf http://www.man-la.com/images/stories/library/16335/_MG_5939.jpg http://hdmagazine.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/MG_5313.jpg What’s interesting is that the Constellation’s 8.9-liter Cummins ISL is rated at 420hp, which runs into the 10.8-liter ISM’s territory. In Europe, the ISL at Euro-5 is rated from 280 to 400 horsepower (260-380 EPA2010), and the Euro-5 ISM from 350 to 445 horsepower (310-425 EPA2007). For Brazil, Cummins was willing to bump up the 8.9-liter ISL to 420hp, where overloading is rare. But for China where Cummins was also asked to supply a near 420 horsepower ISL, and where overloading is still widespread, Cummins felt a 400-plus horsepower ISL needed a displacement increase. This resulted in a new 9.5-liter ISL rated from 292 up to 425 horsepower. Reference: http://www.bigmacktrucks.com/index.php?/topic/32528-cummins-introduces-new-95-liter-isl-series-engine/ http://www.bigmacktrucks.com/index.php?/topic/30250-volkswagen-light-medium-and-heavy-trucks/ .

No, Volvo's Mack unit does not have their own engineering. The engineers are all under Volvo Group. The only Mack-focused people are, realistically, the Volvo sales marketing people assigned to the Mack brand. The main reason the CHN landed onto the Volvo VN frame was because Volvo wanted to build Mack and Volvo on-highway models together on the same Volvo chassis at the former White plant in New River Valley, Virginia. Remember, Volvo wants all their brands to use Volvo global components. Volvo Group shut down Mack Trucks' Winnsboro, South Carolina on-highway truck plant in 2001 and moved that production to New River Valley. Then Volvo's "step two" was to place those Mack on-highway models onto Volvo VN chassis, to save money and standardize on the Volvo platform. Why the United States government would allow Mack Trucks to be sold to a foreign entity is beyond explanation. Our government would not allow that to happen with Ford or GM (Chrysler is another story). Our country's economy depends on a solid foundation of essential pillar industries which includes commercial truck manufacture. And Mack Trucks, without argument, was the finest of all American truckmakers.

Parts are readily available for this widely used engine series (Renault model MIDR 06.20.45) from Renault Truck in Europe. The Renault G340 TI Maxter*, for example, was equipped with this engine rated at 338 horsepower. Given that Volvo Group owns both Renault Truck and the Mack brand, that makes this all the more interesting. Your truck, produced in 1998, is not yet 20 years old. I suggest you call Mack customer service (866-298-6586) at Volvo's U.S. corporate headquarters in Greensboro, North Carolina. Provide them with your model and serial number. Explain that you contacted a Mack dealer and were told the parts are NLA. Tell them your truck is a 1998 and that you have a "truck down" situation. I know how the former Mack Trucks would respond. Let's see what Volvo does. Incidentally, Renault Trucks Defense has supplied a 450 horsepower variant of this engine for military vehicle applications. * The G340 TI Maxter http://www.flickr.com/photos/70373000@N04/10884636643 http://www.flickr.com/photos/77228500@N06/6985200866 http://www.flickr.com/photos/77228500@N06/6985200542 http://ads-img.cdn.mbdsrv.com/pa/536-402/192445/3837125/2013090617227_1.jpg

Originally, BAE wasn't in the picture. Houston-based Stewart & Stevenson (better known for producing specialized equipment for the oil and gas industries) won a US government contract to supply FMTVs (family of medium tactical vehicles) in 1998, an Americanized version (Cat 3116, Allison MD3070PT) of the Steyr model 12M18 from Austria. Armor Holdings bought Stewart & Stevenson's military vehicle division in 2006, and BAE bought Armor Holdings in 2007. And then Oshkosh won the contract away from BAE in 2011 to build FMTVs, despite never having been involved in its development. I like Oshkosh. I don't like the FMTV. For example, the FMTV's Steyr cab, assembled in the US (in order to qualify for the U.S. contract) by McLaughlin Body Company in Moline, Illinois from imported components, is ridiculously expensive.

Since this RS/RL has a white steering wheel (which I particularly liked) and early style grille, and what appears to be a steel dash and olive green interior, I would say the year is around 1970 and it has a CA114 cab. It should have half-dogs on the doors, but the Luber-Finer blocks the view. .

http://www.truckworld.com.au/News/Test_and_Specs_of_CAT_CT630S.aspx http://www.bigrigs.com.au/news/features-of-new-cat-sure-to-impress/2165601/ http://www.cattrucks.com.au/ct630s-a-key-to-cat-growth/ CT630S spec sheet: http://www.cattrucks.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/CT630S_Specification_Sheet.pdf

So far, I don't see a parts availability problem here. Renault (RVI) never offered complete engine rebuild (in-frame) kits. You're asking for something that never existed. Renault did (and still does) offer piston and liner kits, and gasket kits (sets). Obtaining that plus rod and main bearings will get you started. The qualified mechanic who will be doing your in-frame overhaul should have no problem advising you what parts to order, after they have torn the engine down and made sure you don't have any out-of-the-ordinary problems. Unless you have a Mack mechanic with RVI engine experience, make sure they have a Mack service manual for disassembly and reassembly of this engine. And after 16 years, send that Bosch P7100 pump out to a pump shop to be checked out.

Mack CH600 - A New Dimension in Heavy Truck Design .

We talked about the Mack/RVI EM5-290 before. http://www.bigmacktrucks.com/index.php?/topic/31258-mack-rd694p-single-axle-dump/ When you called the folks at Watts Mack and provided them with your truck's model and serial number, did they say the engine parts you need are NLA? (no longer available)

MAN Latin America, responsible for marketing Volkswagen commercial trucks in South America, has announced an 890 unit order of Constellation-based tactical trucks to Brazil’s Ministry of Defense The order, which includes 6x2, 6x4 and 6x6 configurations, will be delivered this year. The militarized variant of the popular Volkswagen Constellation was introduced last April at the 9th edition of LAAD Defence & Security, Defence and Security International Exhibition in Rio De Janeiro. The 6x6 Constellation model 31.320 has a payload capacity of 10 metric tons (22,046 lb). It can traverse water up to 1.5 meters (59.1 inches) deep, climb a 60 percent grade and negotiate 30 percent side slopes. Its 8.3 liter Cummins ISCe engine is rated at 320 horsepower (PS) and 950 lb/ft of torque. .

You are right of course (too much jet lag this month). From the 864 to the E9, the Mack V8s had wet sleeves just as their Scania relatives always have (right up to the present).

I recall this event as if it was yesterday. Every member of the Mack family was filled with pride. Given a chance to contribute, this event demonstrated how close-knit the Mack family was. For us, this was personal. Mack Trucks personified the values upon which our country was built. If one can't depend on Mack Trucks to come through for America in time of need.........then what's left? After all, America itself was built on the backs of Mack trucks. No other truckmaker can say that. I can't describe with words how proud we were of our organization. Zenon C.R. Hansen, who had passed on a year earlier, would have been proud too.