Jump to content

MackMann85

Bulldog
  • Posts

    165
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by MackMann85

  1. it had to be a municipal truck, is that what the salesman told you? If so that very well may add up, however uncommon, and be creating the price premium.  There are plenty of muni trucks that sit several days of the week or are bought with taxpayer money and used as a spare.  I remember the township i grew up in had the dealership do all the maintenance work.  Once every other month they would drop it off on a monday and pick it up the next monday...i bet that old girl had low miles

  2. Since it came out they changed hood, headlights, interior and made the cab deeper when switched to MP engines, added set back axle model as said above, changed chassis and added some options in transmissions and suspensions as new things came out

  3. Did you end up getting it?  I surprisingly really like the purple, it would stand out and look great next to your yellow Superdog!  I'm sure you'll like the extra cab room.  I dont think its geared as bad as some are saying, with tall rubber and i think the overdrive gear in the Mack 13 being .71, it should get decent fuel mileage running up to 68 MPH turning right at 1450 RPM and like they said be good for the 2 lane roads too, 1380 RPM running 65.  If you are hauling heavy 90k+ like i assume you do with the big crane i see in the picture sometimes, you want something in the 3.5 to 3.9 range for your rears anyhow.  Hope you like it, let us know!

  4. You have to look at your overall drive ratio.  Take top gear multiplied by the axle ratio and you will find your overdrive transmission with 3.21 rears is actually geared faster than the direct drive trans,  Meaning you may like how the direct pulls slightly better but the cruise rpms may be higher.  So the advantage you get with direct drive may be a wash with the higher cruise rpm.  But it wont be weak like you are worried about.  This is assuming tires are the same between trucks so you'll have to take that into account if not too

  5. I would like to get the kscarbel take on this....seems confusing to me strategically.

    Move away from Navistar production (could lower cost, perhaps less margin included from NAV), only to move to USA (american production good) at a plant not making trucks (more labor and tooling, adds cost to product). Quality could go either way (built in USA but no truck experience), but they are still using NAV components and chassis. A new 15L engine, but they dont want to get back into engine business (does that only leave the ISX and DD15?). And all announced in a press release that seems about a year too soon. What a mess!

  6. My new magazine came today in the mail, just as nice as ever!!! Looks like they are updating the subscription list and they gave a link to go to to confirm your address to keep getting it in hard copy. I went to the link and it worked and didnt take too long. I guess it makes sense to do it every so often as people move, pass away, etc to avoid wasting money

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...