Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
kscarbel2

Volkswagen’s Chattanooga Workers Vote for Second Time Not to Join UAW

Recommended Posts

Clifford Atiyeh, Car & Driver  /  June 15, 2019

A vote to unionize the Tennessee plant would have been the first for a foreign automaker in the U.S. But there's a bigger story behind the UAW than just a campaign.

UPDATE 9:50 p.m.: According to a statement from the UAW that denounced VW's "brutal campaign of fear and misinformation," employees at VW’s Chattanooga plant have voted against joining the UAW for the second time in five years. It will be another year before a new election can be called. Final numbers were not yet available.

Friday marks the final day for Volkswagen Chattanooga employees to vote for representation in the United Auto Workers as the union, just two months after its vice president pleaded guilty to federal corruption charges, attempts to continue to win a decades-long fight to get union representation into foreign automakers' plants.

The vote, which was last held in 2014 and rejected 712 to 626, started Wednesday and includes 1700 full-time hourly employees out of the total 3800. The remaining, ineligible employees are either salaried or contract workers. The UAW claims "legal obstruction and anti-worker activity" by Volkswagen, which, aside from joint ventures in China that are partly controlled by the state, operates its only non-union factory in Tennessee. The UAW established Local 42 several months after plant workers voted against representation and alleged interference in the election by Tennessee politicians, which led VW in November of that year to allow several labor organizations into the plant if they met a membership threshold. It's unclear how many VW employees UAW Local 42 represents, but the union filed a petition in April with the National Labor Relations Board to hold a second vote. The results will either make Volkswagen the first and only foreign-owned U.S.. plant to formally unionize, or not.

Tennessee is one of 28 states with a Right to Work law, which mandates that a union cannot require employee membership—and with it the payment of dues and tacit approval of the union's political lobbying—as a condition of employment. Governor Bill Lee hasn't been as vocal a critic as former South Carolina governor Nikki Haley, who said she was kicking unions with her high heels. Lee told VW employees earlier this year that a "direct relationship" between a company and its employees is the best working environment. Previously, the UAW alleged that Tennessee, under former governor Bill Halsam, had predicated $300 million in state tax incentives on VW's blocking union representation. That allegation remains unproven.

But while pro-union advocates claim the region's conservative politicians are buying into corporate donations and squashing blue-collar worker rights, the UAW also stands accused of cozy relationships with politicians on the other side of the aisle who have done little to bolster the union's declining membership and failed to intervene in its multimillion-dollar scandal with Fiat Chrysler. Federal prosecutors in 2017 brought fraud and conspiracy charges against FCA labor relations chief Alphons Iacobelli and several UAW officials for siphoning millions of dollars—paid in large part by UAW member dues—into lavish vacations, cars, plane tickets, and jeweled $37,000 pens. Iacobelli is serving more than five years in prison while another FCA labor employee, Nancy Johnson, is serving a year.

Former UAW vice president Norwood Jewell pled guilty in April to accepting tens of thousands of dollars' worth of meals and golf expenses from FCA. He faces up to 18 months in prison. Former vice president General Holiefield was also targeted for funneling more than $260,000 to pay off his mortgage and another $200,000 to buy furniture and jewelry but escaped the charges since he died in 2015. His widow, Monica Morgan, is serving 18 months in prison. Virdell King, a UAW leader who helped negotiate FCA contracts in 2011 and 2015, served two months in prison.

The UAW has never gained a foothold into any wholly foreign-owned U.S. plant—not at Volkswagen, and not BMW, Honda, Hyundai, Kia, Mercedes-Benz, Mitsubishi, Nissan, Subaru, Toyota, or Volvo.

National UAW membership, which stood at 1.5 million in 1979, now claims just 430,000, and that number is bolstered by the inclusion of non-auto workers such as casino employees.

The UAW itself blames NAFTA—which President Bill Clinton championed in the 1990s—for shifting hundreds of thousands of jobs to Mexico, which pays only a fraction of the $30-per-hour wage that more senior line workers receive before including benefits. That's in part true, but the UAW's most successful labor contracts—which guaranteed lifetime medical payments for retirees, among other unsustainable pension benefits—helped push General Motors and Chrysler into bankruptcy by 2009.

Compare the Big Three automakers, which continue to fire thousands of UAW workers at a time and then rehire them years later in a relentless boom-and-bust cycle, to Honda, which never in its 36-year manufacturing history in the U.S. has resorted to layoffs.

Non-union employment seems to work, or else it wouldn't have. Pay and benefits at VW top out at an estimated $23.50 per hour. Taxes and cost of living in the Midwestern and Southern states are significantly lower than metropolitan areas where such factories, such as GM's plant outside Baltimore, cease to be profitable.

In the end, it's up to VW workers—and any auto worker employed by so many successful foreign manufacturers—to decide if the UAW is worth their own money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they had a majority vote to inject the union they would likely still not seed it well due to the “Right to Work” legislation. It would take a nearly unanimous vote. The union still has to provide certain services to people who have refused payment and include them in collective bargaining even though they are not paying members. The no-voters would starve the union. The Right to Work here has not been a union buster, it’s more of a union stunter. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, GA_Dave said:

I have talked with several employees of that VW plant and they are happy with the working conditions, pay and benefits that VW is providing.  They do not want the union!  The UAW has been trying to force their way in since right after the plant opened.

The union wants their cut though 😁.  According to a lot of the union guys good pay isn’t possible without a union. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The real issue is that the plant is running at nowhere near full capacity and still injuring too many workers. Demand for the Passat has cratered and was never enough to keep the line busy on even one shift. Then VW made a billion dollar expansion to build their 3 row SUV, which isn't selling that well either- If they ran at Detroit's car a minute line rates they could fill the whole demand with one line working one shift. And now VW's planning another billion dollar expansion to build electric cars that won't sell either?

It gets worse- The NA Passat has become an oddball on the old Passat platform that shares little with the Euro Passat, and the SUV has a Skoda version but that's probably not a high volume product either. Then there's the worker's comp liability- besides the millions in long term claims, every worker lost from the workplace in today's tight labor market is a loss for both VW and the Chattanooga area. With worker recruitment and retention becoming a major part of corporate strategy, this trend does not bode well for VW.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/15/2019 at 9:01 PM, kscarbel2 said:

But while pro-union advocates claim the region's conservative politicians are buying into corporate donations and squashing blue-collar worker rights,

Squashing worker rights? You have the right to work for someone. Don't need a union to negotiate that. Figure out what you need to make to live, divide it into 40 hours/week over 52 weeks, throw a little extra on top and tell em that's what you need to make during your hiring interview. Not that hard, just gotta be ready to justify why you're worth that much.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You never tell them what you need. You tell them what you want and if they  don't see it your way move on  ,because in TN you sure ain't going to get step raises and cost of living increases  yearly .but you will get a layoff slip and a chance to reapply for your your job for less money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...