Jump to content

D-Day

Bulldog
  • Posts

    201
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by D-Day

  1. Saw this earlier this week not sure if it’s from coal country but I like the tri drive setup Hendrickson walking beams with the third drive axle cantilevered off of the second drive axle 

    IMG_0811.jpeg

    • Like 2
  2. There was a thread on here from a couple of years ago titled engine size in 65 Mack B53 and he posted some nice pictures proof that the tip turbine will fit under the hood, I do know the front crossmember/engine mount is different also another issue is if you have a single plate clutch with the short bell housing you would want to change to a two plate clutch with a little stronger transmission to handle the higher torque rating and you would have to redrill the rear mounts through the frame relocating them farther to the rear

    • Like 2
  3. I have repaired and replaced numerous aluminum frames most were KW and Peterbilt used as log trucks the extreme rough roads would brake the rails vertically near the cab the Mack rails I have only seen small horizontal cracks around the rear suspension other than scale or delaminating as some call the rot where it contacts the steel if its always been on the pavement its probably not a concern easy to check with a good light

    • Like 2
  4. This was built at a local shop and we are grateful for it they built an improved version and that’s how we got this rear steer lowboy sure makes it easier to get around when you have miles of tight turns and alot of switchbacks the driver at the back will suffer dusty conditions but 

    IMG_0750.jpeg

    • Like 2
  5. I have not seen 44 rears set up with soft bushings before but I can see it would not be to bad with a good set of polyurethane bushings if your not loading heavy regularly and maxing out the trunion shaft is the same diameter for the 38 and 44 but the axle housings can be heavier for the 44,000 check the rear right side of the housing for number code stamp for the axle housing rating

  6. 47 minutes ago, The Rubber Duck 006 said:

    I drove a 1997 Mack CH613 Gold bulldog with the Elite interior for the owner operator. I think the Mack Motor had 400hp. Pulled 34,000lbs plus 12,000lbs at 70mph no problem 

     

    32 minutes ago, Geoff Weeks said:

    Wind resistance and wind direction can have more effect than weight. When I pulled 48K+ re-bar loads, my mileage was closed to what I would get with an empty trailer. Sure it pulled the grades slower but it also rolled along on the down hill side much further without needing throttle, was less effected by wind gusts etc.

    Because wind resistance goes to the square of speed, a little increase in speed makes a big difference in power required to move at that speed, and of course fuel to to get that power.

    Thanks for the truck driver point of view on these things some of us who have never driven do not know these interesting things about trucking if you work on the sidelines its hard to imagine how it all works as a mechanic its not always easy to figure out the drivers point of view

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...