Jump to content

mackdaddy

BMT Benefactor
  • Posts

    702
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

Posts posted by mackdaddy

  1. 12 hours ago, Rob said:

    And this one doesn't have "it"?

    image.jpeg.3afdba59548b713e7aea2882c4223e06.jpeg

    That truck belonged to Roy ?? out of Nevada. It was a self loading logger when new. His LTH with Ellis split manifolds is in the Keystone Museum now. I have a picture of him as a young man driving a 47 LT log truck. I think back with a little sadness of all the great trucker buddies we have lost over the past decade with Roy being one of them.

  2. 13 hours ago, Mike Harbison said:

    That's odd.

    It is and I have been looking closely at all of the early B's and F's that used the same style side panels. There appears to be many different styles and I assume it may have to do with the engine that is installed. This BM was ordered from the factory with the larger cube engine that was the standard in the BX so I am thinking there must have been a difference??

  3. 6 hours ago, CaptainCrutch said:

    C motors have the exhaust manifold on the driver side of the truck, this one has it on the passenger. The thing that leads me to believe it’s a B motor is the pattern on the block. My ‘53 has a B motor in it so the year isn’t really a reliable way of figuring out which motor I’ve learned...

    yes it is a B

    • Like 2
  4. A Bob Brown original...…...the LTL...…..Bob Brown...….The Greatest Name in Trucks. That is how I made up the plaque honoring Bob at the Pacific Northwest Truck Museum Store. That LTL was sold to a guy in Rutford, VT and Bob drove it all the way out there with his wife following in the car. When he got there the guy didn't have the money and refused to buy the truck. Fortunately for Bob the Eiler Bros in VT wanted it.

     

     

    • Like 1
  5. 50 minutes ago, carlotpilot said:

    mackdaddy  .    whats the story on those two ars. machines in the photo ? are you involved in that kind of work or are they just in for something else?  super nice job on the mack :twothumbsup:

    I have a dozen of those machines. yes, I am an industrial painting contractor. Steel grit works great out west inland where there is no humidity and months without rain!! we also do a lot of robotic blasting with grit in penstocks. we had 4 units on this project for 2yrs.

     

    1980-01-01 00.00.25.jpg

  6. 8 hours ago, CaptainCrutch said:

    The W actually used the same frame rails as the LT, with a dip at the front so the engines would sit lower... other than that I’m just repeating what Mack themselves have said...

    The H is the cabover L but the W is specifically the cabover LT...

    The W model used the same frame rails as the LTL. The LTH was 1/16" thicker and of course less aluminum pieces. I have built from scratch both the LTL and the W model. Until you get up to the front spring hangers and the front axle they are identical as frame and cross members go. of course there is also the cab mounts that differ.

    • Like 1
  7. 12 hours ago, CaptainCrutch said:

    Unfortunately... I didn’t think the W-71 was exactly unpopular, does anyone know why they stopped making it so soon? I have a hunch it’s because it was just a cabover version of the LT so they wanted to retire the two together despite such the limited run of the Ws...

    The G model was much more advanced for the times and was the Western Mack replacement.

     

    • Like 1
  8. On 1/30/2020 at 8:11 PM, convoyduel said:

    Interesting that they went with the earlier CH style shallow rear wall cab, I guess to get the BBC down.   Nice looking truck but the auto shifter is straight out of a mid 90’s setup.  Also, without a crew cab option, they miss out on a lot of muni/state DOT sales.  Hopefully they aren’t priced like the Titan was.  

    Is the cab the same width as a CH or did it get narrowed down?

     

×
×
  • Create New...