Welcome to BigMackTrucks.com
![]() |
Welcome to BigMackTrucks.com, the best resource on the Internet for Antique, Classic and Modern Mack Trucks!
Please login or register to take advantage of everything BMT has to offer. Memberships are Free and offer many benefits:
If you are having trouble logging in or haven't received your validation email, you can post as a guest in the Guest Forum.
|
CH 613 series
#1
OFFLINE
Posted 27 April 2012 - 12:10 PM
MADNESS TAKES ITS TOLL, PLEASE HAVE EXACT CHANGE
P.T. CHESHIRE
#2
OFFLINE
Posted 27 April 2012 - 12:30 PM
#3
OFFLINE
Posted 27 April 2012 - 12:39 PM
#4
OFFLINE
Posted 27 April 2012 - 03:46 PM
I've got an '01 CH...would prefer the interior the 99's have (cup holder on the dash...away from Dozer). 150K to 300K miles is pretty low. Bought mine in '08 with 260K on the odometer...4 years later, it's over 660K. The 350 might be underpowered if you're going to run 80,000 pounds all of the time, but if you're going to be lighter it might not be so bad. The good news is that you can upgrade....cam, timing, etc...to get more out of it if you want to....but all that costs money.
The mileage seems low to me also, checked the # and they were all used by a L.I. company called BlueLinx delivering building supplies to local lumber yards. I'm curious about the chassis specs. If they check out and go with a good price, I'll put my Weldbilt equipment carrier body on it. No real heavy loads carried. We'll see on Monday when they reopen.
MADNESS TAKES ITS TOLL, PLEASE HAVE EXACT CHANGE
P.T. CHESHIRE
#5
OFFLINE
Posted 27 April 2012 - 04:54 PM
#6
OFFLINE
Posted 27 April 2012 - 05:35 PM
#7
OFFLINE
Posted 27 April 2012 - 06:25 PM

POPULAR
Attached Files
#8
OFFLINE
Posted 28 April 2012 - 11:16 AM
1999's are E-tech engines, it would be nice to know if they had camshafts and other up-dates, if they did, they should be good. The dealer should be able to confirm the miles on the engine ECM, and also tell you fuel mileage. For what you're doing you should be happy with a 350. With the 44k rears, I believe a double frame or at least a single 8MM (5/16") was mandatory, which is a plus if you're going to stretch it.
Being my first unit with an ECM I didn't know the mileage could be pulled up. I'll ask the dealer to pull that up on monday One has a single rail chassis 3 have double rails. Like I said the electronic controls are an entirely new world for me on trucks. thanks Paul
MADNESS TAKES ITS TOLL, PLEASE HAVE EXACT CHANGE
P.T. CHESHIRE
#9
OFFLINE
Posted 28 April 2012 - 11:32 AM

POPULAR
That right there is some good logic. Just imagine the manyDrove a new 1993 CH with a 400 and a 13 speed and it was a great truck and pulled well. In this economy I would go with the 350 and not worry about getting some where 5 minutes sooner.
In many ways those really were "simpler times".
Rob

Raining on your parade
#10
OFFLINE
Posted 28 April 2012 - 11:42 AM
#11
OFFLINE
Posted 02 May 2012 - 05:55 PM
#12
OFFLINE
Posted 02 May 2012 - 09:12 PM
#13
OFFLINE
Posted 03 May 2012 - 06:20 AM
Paul, I think Bluelinx used to be the trucking division of Georgia-Pacific. They always took good care of their trucks. Before the CH's they had all R models. Usually with aluminum wheels and headache racks. Like the oil companies, they may have ordered the trucks without things like the PTO drive gear in the trans just to save a few pounds.
I didn't realize how long they'd been around until i read this. I first heard of them about 10 years ago when they started branding the equipment with the Blue Linx name. I used to deliver to many of the same business as them and the trucks always looked good, the driver's took pride in them too.
Around here it's all local, multistop deliveries, becoming lighter throughout the day and usually returning very light or empty.
love that ch tim maikshilo
Sharpest CH I've ever seen. Mack Green with black spokes and some bling. Perfect.
Jim
I'm outta likes.
#14
OFFLINE
Posted 05 May 2012 - 06:19 PM
Top.BMP-4.jpg 241.7K
5 downloads
#15
OFFLINE
Posted 05 May 2012 - 07:39 PM
MADNESS TAKES ITS TOLL, PLEASE HAVE EXACT CHANGE
P.T. CHESHIRE
#16
OFFLINE
Posted 06 May 2012 - 05:17 AM
#17
OFFLINE
Posted 06 May 2012 - 02:16 PM
#18
OFFLINE
Posted 06 May 2012 - 02:36 PM
as I got off the exit ramp as he went by he got on the horn and said, Lowboy....you can really move the mail! That made my day for sure
Ha! That is one of those things you should tell your kids someday when you go by there.
My grandfather never had a nice truck, but when we would be hauling hogs in his 1950's IHC and get up to 50mph on a downhill run, he would get a big grin, lean over and yell over the sound of the engine; "now we are really hauling the mail"!
#19
OFFLINE
Posted 08 May 2012 - 01:47 PM
I bet the he was gripping the wheel with both hands as he said that too!Ha! That is one of those things you should tell your kids someday when you go by there.
My grandfather never had a nice truck, but when we would be hauling hogs in his 1950's IHC and get up to 50mph on a downhill run, he would get a big grin, lean over and yell over the sound of the engine; "now we are really hauling the mail"!
#20
OFFLINE
Posted 08 May 2012 - 04:53 PM
I'll take some, I keep forgeting I bought a real camera instead of a phone.Sounds good Paul, do you have any photo's of the truck your looking at?
As for horsepower..I just need to do the job get there and get home speed is secondary. Paul
MADNESS TAKES ITS TOLL, PLEASE HAVE EXACT CHANGE
P.T. CHESHIRE
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

















